How to stop a bank run

By Joel Thurtell

A frantic financial adviser told me she’s warning everyone she knows with money in National City Bank, dead sure NatCity’s going under: Get your money out!

And I thought, gosh, isn’t that sort of like, well, promoting a bank run?

Panic!

She didn’t see it that way. She felt morally obligated to call people she knew who had more than $100,000 in National City. That’s the limit of federal insurance on bank deposits at the moment, though Congress may change that.

It made me think of a story I wrote 24 years ago for the South Bend Tribune, about a banker who stood up to the government during FDR’s 1933 Bank Holiday and refused to shut her bank.

A year ago, it was Countrywide, then last summer it was IndyMac.
Wachovia’s in deep weeds today.

But the tiny G.W. Jones Exchange bank in Marcellus, Michigan, didn’t need suitors when President Franklin Delano Roosevelt ordered all the nation’s banks to close from March 6-10 in 1933 (although she recalled it was in 1932, which would be when Herbert Hoover was still president) to stop people from withdrawing so much money it would cause banks to fail in some cases even if they were fundamentally sound.

Donna Schurtz told me the story in 1984 of how she trumped the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and won the right to keep her bank open. Apparently, the Jones bank was the only one in the country to stay open.

I was living in Marcellus at the time my story about Donna Schurtz ran in the Tribune’s Sunday Michiana Magazine on January 29, 1984. We had a checking and savings account at the Jones Bank, a dignified building with stone and mortar facade in a village so small you could hear cows lowing at one end of town and smell pig manure from the other side. There were 1,134 men, women and children living in Marcellus in 1980.

Marcellus is in the northeast corner of Cass County, a rolling, heavily wooded county with lots of streams and lakes. In 1980 there were 49,499 people and 199,000 pigs in Cass County. Hogs were not the only agriculture in Cass County. That rolling country was ideal for raising hogs on open range, and it provided great cover for some sizable marijuana plantations, which the sheriff would raid, directing cops to the spot from the county helicopter.

Much of the legitimately-earned money went into the Jones bank. I knew people from as far off as Three Rivers who were old enough to have lived through the Great Depression and still did all their banking at the G.W. Jones Exchange Bank because they remembered how Donna Schurtz kept her doors open when every other bank closed.

The Jones Bank was founded by her grandfather, G.W. Jones, a Quaker who went to California during the Gold Rush. The family had been Abolitionists before the Civil War and maintained a station on the Underground Railroad, helping slaves to freedom in Canada.

Why’d they do it? “They loved the excitement,” she told me.

That’s also why she got geeked about wildcatting for oil in Cass County. “It relieved the monotony,” she said.

In 1850, hearing that his father was sick, her grandfather was in California. He strapped gold onto his body in leather money bags and went home to pay off the family debts.

However, family members argue over whether he actually had much gold — maybe it was only enough to make gold wedding ring.

In 1869, G.W. heard a railroad was coming through and platted Marcellus and doggone, in 1870, the Peninsular Railroad came through and G.W. made money selling lots in the fledgling village. Then he made $14,000 on a clover and timothy seed deal.

In 1877, he started the bank. By 1884, its assets were $86,561.35.
In those days, there was no federal deposit insurance. If a bank failed, you were out of luck. My paternal grandparents, Howard C. and Harriet Thurtell, lost all their savings when their bank failed in the Depression. That would have been around the time Donna Schurtz was battling the feds to keep her bank open.

In the 1880s, the bank didn’t pay interest. People considered themselves lucky to have a safe place to store their cash.

They hoped.

In Marcellus in 1907, a new bank was founded and it offered higher interest than the 3 percent G.W. Jones was paying.

The Jones bank handed out pencils stamped “Better sleep on 3 percent than lie awake on higher rates.”

By the early 1930s, the Jones bank was still competing against the First State Bank of Marcellus.

Vaughn Bartlet, onetime mayor, fire chief, postmaster, village marshal, county treasurer in Marcellus and Cass County told me how he was warned the First State Bank was about to go under.

“An old-timer fellow said to me one day, ‘Vaughn, the bank’s gonna go broke here in a few days.’ ”

“I says, ‘How do you know?’ ”

“He says, ‘I saw Sam Lowery, the cashier, working there with his derby on — he’s ready to run out of there any minute.’ ”

“My sister-in-law had a lot of money in there (the First State Bank) and she got 50 cents on the dollar,” Bartlett told me.

That  gives you some idea of the banking industry in Marcellus, where peppermint farming was big and farmers would store their distilled mint — worth plenty — in the bank vault.

When I lived in Marcellus, running the South Bend Tribune’s Cass County News Bureau from the front porch of our house in the early 1980s, there was a drinking fountain near the teller windows with a sign that said, “A FREE DRINK.”

In 1921, Donna Schurtz took over the bank. She was 28. She’d earned a bachelor’s degree from the University of Michigan in 1916. Her major: Latin.

When I interviewed Donna Schurtz in 1984, she was 90 and still reading Cicero in the original Latin. Her daughter, Abigail Schten, was listening to our conversation.

Donna Schurtz had a great sense of humor. She told me how her grandfather walked to California.

“Well, he did have some common sense, and he decided he wasn’t going to walk back. So he went south to Panama, rode up the Mississippi home.”

“Well, now, mother,” said Abigail Schten, “How would he get from Panama to the Mississippi River?”

Donna Schurtz burst into laughter: “You tell me!”

When the order came to shut the bank, she told me, “Well, we phoned down to Washington and said, ‘Now we’re perfectly sound. Our community is unused to what you have requested.’ ”

“Well, you had to allow the public to have some money in its pocket, or they would have gone crazy!

We had quite a balance in Detroit (in a correspondent bank), and we had asked the teller — the currency department — to send us $40,000.”

“They said, ‘Forty thousand dollars!’ ”

“And I said, ‘You send that to us, or we’ll come right up there and look after you.’ Well, we got it. Nothing to be polite about.”

An armored car brought the currency, which she stacked on counters and window sills. Then she invited townspeople to come into the bank and see that it had money.

Spreading a rumor that a man wearing a derby hat means a bank is going bust is one way to start people withdrawing their funds in droves.

But stacking packets of real currency where everybody can see it is a way to stop a bank run.

Now, I can hear poeple saying, “That’s a quaint story from yesteryear, but stacking hundred dollar bills in the windows of hundreds of Wachovia branches ain’t gonna save that bank.”

No, you’re right.

But think about it: Wouldn’t the financial bailout plan of Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke accomplish roughly the same thing Donna Schurtz managed to do in tiny Marcellus back in ’33?

She knew that if her customers could see the money, they would not be so likely to stampede her teller windows and actually demand to have their savings.

She bolstered their confidence that the micro-economy surrounding her little G. W. Jones Exchange Bank was sound.

It’s 2008 now, and we’re talking macro-macro-macro, but the logic is the same.

Isn’t spreading $700 billion of cash through the financial system sort of like stacking currency on a bank’s counters?

It might just be what it takes to keep our economy — and we’re talking the world’s economy  — from slapping on its derby hat and hightailing it.

We’re talking faith, but sometimes faith needs a kick-start.

Still, there are differences, it seems to me, between Donna Schurtz’s stunt in 1933 and the plans for a massive bailout of banks today. In 1933, President Roosevelt was imposing discipline and REGULATION on financial institutions with the creation of safeguards like deposit insurance and watachdogs like the Securities and Exchange Commission. But the Bush regime has dismantled and defanged those watchdogs, leading us back to a situation more like my grandparents faced under the Republican pro-business Herbert Hoover.

Then too, Donna Schurtz’s $40 k was backed by something of substance — gold in Fort Knox.

What’s behind the Treasury’s $700 B today?

Faith — and a mammoth printing press.

There was nothing inflationary about what Donna Schurtz did. Can we say the same about creating hundreds of billions of new money?

The biggest difference of all between 1933 and today, of course, is that back then the nation had someone in charge — someone who cared more about the common good than about the good of corporations.

Keep the faith, for sure, and keep your fingers crossed.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in How to stop a bank run | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Playing ball with Matty

By Joel Thurtell

Matty doesn’t get it.

Batter up! Softball game at ball diamond in Detroit's Riverside Parak Extension, part of which has been seized by Ambassador Brige owner Mattyh Moroun. Joel Thurtell photo.

Batter up! Softball game at ball diamond in Detroit’s Riverside Park Extension, part of which has been seized by Ambassador Bridge owner Matty Moroun. Joel Thurtell photo.

Why are people suddenly so upset that he’s taken over parts of a Detroit city-owned park beside the Ambassador Bridge?

Why, it’s been seven years since 9/11, when he seized the east side of the park extension near 23rd Street, a block south of Fort.

Nobody cared then. Seven years!

And it’s been nearly that long since the park’s boat launch was shut down — by the city Recreation Department, he says, not by him.

Now, I have to admit, I didn’t actually have a face-to-face with Matty. My conversation was with Dan Stamper, president of the Detroit International Bridge Co. which runs the bridge owned by Matty Moroun. I suspect what Dan Stamper tells me pretty much mirrors what his boss wants me to hear.

“For seven years, nobody gave a shit,” Dan Stamper said. “For seven years, nobody comes down here.”

Actually, it’s not true that nobody cared. Plenty of people were upset, but powerless to stop Matty.

I talked to Dan Stamper through a chain-link fence at the Riverside Park Extension, near the area Matty took over as a security buffer zone after the Twin Towers were destroyed by terrorists on September 11, 2001.

Construction materials stored on Riverside Park Extension, a formerly public area owned by City of Detroit. Joel Thurtell photo.

Construction materials stored on Riverside Park Extension, a formerly public area owned by City of Detroit. Joel Thurtell photo.

Once up on a time, there were basketball courts, shade trees and a lawn where now Matty is storing concrete tubes, gravel and construction equipment.

The occasion was a softball game underway at a ball field on the park. The game was organized by people who want the city to take back its park.

The “somebody” who came down there and suddenly changed the picture for Matte was me. The rage at Matty erupted last week, after I posted a column describing how one of Matty’s security guards ejected me from the park. He saw me taking photos with my little shirt-pocket Canon, a big no-no for the federal Homeland Security folks, so the guard and Matty-via-Stamper claim. But I’ve heard from other people who were hassled by bridge security for simply being in the park, no camera in hand.

Problem for this rationale is that if you talk to federal Department of Homeland Security people, they tell you they haven’t given Matty authority to take over the park, eject people or ban photography beside the bridge. Their concern is what’s ON the bridge, not what’s UNDER it, according to Ron Smith, a spokesman for U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Meanwhile, city officials told me the park belongs to the public and some within the administration are pushing for Mayor Ken Cockrel to sue Matty to get the park back. Judging from the fact that city folks told me two days ago they can no longer talk to me, which makes me think maybe something is going to happen.

At last.

A few minutes before I talked to Dan Stamper, I watched Deb Sumner detach one of Matty’s fake

Deb Sumner holds MAtty Moroun's phony "HOMELAND SECURITY" sign moments after she removed it from the gate of the city of Detroit boat launch in Riverside Park on October 1, 2008. Joel Thurtell photo.

Deb Sumner holds Matty Moroun’s phony “HOMELAND SECURITY” sign moments after she removed it from the gate of the city of Detroit boat launch in Riverside Park on October 1, 2008. Joel Thurtell photo.

“HOMELAND SECURITY” signs from the locked gate to the city’s boat ramp, the one city officials told me Matty shut down a few months after 9/11.

Deb Sumner is a community activist in Southwest Detroit. She told me she has great faith in Mayor Cockrel, who’s always been responsive when she’s called him for help or advice about neihgborhood matters.

What’s changed for Matty is one huge thing: Kwame Kilpatrick is no longer mayor. According to Deb Sumner, Kwame was a big barrier to stopping Matty Moroun from pushing his development projects which she contends often worked to the detriment of Southwest Detroit.

I’ve heard the same thing from insiders at the City-County Building — Kwame and Matty were buddies, so the former hizzoner and soon to be jailbird put the brakes on confronting Matty over Riverside Park.

But Matty-through-Dan Stamper told me, “I had nothing to do with closing the boat launch.”

Nothing?

My city sources told me Matty ordered the city to close the boat launch a few months after 9/11, citing bridge security concerns.

But according to Dan Stamper’s companion, bridge security director Jack Teatsorth, the city closed the ramp in 2001 after 9/11 and declined to re-open it in spring 2002, citing lack of funds.

Nothing to do with Matty.

Hmmm. Bit of a contradiction here. I need to put this question to city officials. I’m trying to file a Freedom of Information Act request for records about the park.

Meantime, I wondered, whose sign is on the gate leading to the boat ramp? It looks identical to the fake Homeland Security signs festooned on the chain link fence Matty placed on what used to be a public park a couple hundred yards north of the boat ramp.

“We put that sign up,” Teatsorth said. After the city closed the ramp for lack of money, he said, Matty’s people offered to put up one of their custom-made “DUE TO HOMELAND SECURITY NO TRESPASSING” signs to absolve the city of liability in case some unauthorized person went in and later sued. “The sign would be great for them.”

Okay, I said. Whose padlocks are on the gates?

“We put the padlocks on the gates,” Teatsorth said. Bridge workers need to get into the launch area to have access to a bridge tower.

Uh-huh. But the fence and gate belong to the city, right?

Well, not exactly, Teatsorth said. “In oh-two, someone hit the fence. The city didn’t have funding to take care of it. We fixed it. If that’s not trying to do something good,…”

To sum up, then, the city closed the boat launch — according to Matty.

But the “HOMELAND SECURITY NO TRESPASSING” sign is Matty’s.

That's Matty's padlock, but the Ambassador Bridge owner denies closing Detroit's Riverside Park boat launch, although the NO TRESPASSING sign, the padlocks and the gate belong to him. Joel Thurtell photo.

That’s Matty’s padlock, but the Ambassador Bridge owner denies closing Detroit’s Riverside Park boat launch,. NO TRESPASSING sign, padlocks and gate belong to him. Joel Thurtell photo.

The padlocks are Matty’s

The gate is Matty’s

Okay, I think I get the picture.

What would happen if I tried to drive my boat into that launch, maybe tie it up to a city dock?

Ask Wade Streeter.

He’s a licensed tugboat captain who was piloting his 16-foot boat in the Detroit River one day last month and when he approached the city’s boat launch, guards on the Ambassador Bridge reported him to the Border Patrol.

Remember, the boat launch is, according to the city, public property. And the Detroit River is a public waterway.

Just to recap: The city closed the launch. But Matty put up the NO TRESPASSING sign. Matty installed two padlocks. Matty replaced the gate. And anyone who tries to enter the launch from the Detroit River will face questioning by Border Patrol officers called to the scene by Matty’s hirelings.

Who controls the boat launch, the city or Matty?

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Adventures on the Rouge, Kwamegate, Me & Matty | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Matty of fact

TAKE BACK THE PARK softball game. Meet 4:15 p.m. today (10-1-8) at Detroit’s Riverside Park. Gane at 5 p.m. Wear black t-shirts. Bring your own water!

[donation]

By Joel Thurtell

From: Joel Thurtell, Former Journalist

To; Matty Moroun, Tyrant Tycoon

Dear Matty:

I’m very disappointed in you, Matty. I hoped you would answer my appeal to you for giving back

Matty Moroun's Ambassador Bridge. Joel Thurtell photo.

Matty Moroun's Ambassador Bridge. Joel Thurtell photo.

Riverside Park and its public boat launch to the people of Detroit who own it. I also was hoping that you would respond to my request that you cite the federal Homeland Security authority you have invoked as you have had your shotgun-toting vassals harass citizens out of the public park adjoining your cherished Ambassador Bridge and which you also claim as good reason for seizing and using for your own trashy purposes sections of the City of Detroit’s Riverside Park.

I staked a lot on my belief that underneath all that mean-guy behavior there is a beating heart with a shard or two or empathy for people who are not, like you, billionaire international bridge owners.

I mean, Matty, what are the REAL reporters going to say, the ones at the two Detroit dailies who choose not to report on your activities as a billionaire trucking mogul who defies laws in Canada and the U.S.?

Ball diamond fence at Riverside Park Extension at end of 23rd St. near Fort in Detroit. Joel Thurtell photo.

Ball diamond fence at Riverside Park Extension at end of 23rd St. near Fort in Detroit. Joel Thurtell photo.

I’m afraid now that those REAL reporters are going to poke fun at me and say I was naive to think you might actually prove to have a decent side. They will probably agree with your minion, Mr. Dan Stamper, that I am nothing but a “former journalist” and my sense of what is a story is fifth-rate at best, given that I am not on the salary of a daily newspaper and don’t have a business card that says I’m a “staff writer.”

But I would say to them, Matty, that you really DID answer me. Once again, your pawn, Mr. Dan Stamper, appears to have written up your response, but this time he addressed it to Deb Sumner, a civic leader in Southwest Detroit who has long been critical of you. But Mr. Dan Stamper was so kind as to have a copy of his letter to Deb Sumner emailed to me so that I would get the message, albeit indirectly.

The message I got is surrounded by one of the largest and densest expanses of vacant verbal real estate I have ever seen, but it does sort of address my question about your authority to bully people and even the City of Detroit by intoning the fearsome phrase, “Due to Homeland Security.”

Here is, in part, what your myrmidon of misinformation wrote to Deb Sumner:

The horrific events of 9/11 created a coming together of government agencies, along with public

Security guard who kicked me out of Riverside Park, falsely claiming "Homeland Security." Joel Thurtell photo.

Security guard who kicked me out of Riverside Park, falsely claiming "Homeland Security." Joel Thurtell photo.

and private corporations that own and operate critical infrastructures, in our country.  The changes that have happened at airports, tunnels, seaports, power plants and bridges are staggering, but necessary.  Our participation with all the federal agencies in a coordinated effort to better protect infrastructure and the traveling public is a daily endeavor, and yes, our participation did require creating a buffer zone around the bridge.

For some time now our efforts to secure the bridge have come under fire from a select few who have asserted we are operating outside of our boundaries.  Let me be clear.  Our efforts to secure one of the nation’s busiest border crossings and one of Michigan’s most valuable economic assets is well within the obligation of the Bridge Company.  All of our enhanced security efforts have been implemented in coordination and partnership with all federal agencies who have responsibility to secure our nation’s borders.

Here’s some language directly from a report from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) regarding its Strategic Plan, Fiscal Years 2008 – 2013. As it relates to the DHS’s efforts to preventing “external threats from coming to fruition,” they wrote:

“Building an effective national emergency response system will entail continuing efforts to develop and sustain national partnerships across all levels of government, voluntary organizations, and the private sector…”

In addition, the DHS wrote:
“Homeland security also requires a robust vertical integration of the federal, state, local, and tribal governments, the private and non-profit sectors, and the American citizen to build a secure, safe, and resilient Nation.”

To effectively do this, we have worked with all the security agencies to implement the appropriate measures to adequately secure one of our nation’s critical infrastructures.  All operations and efforts to do so are in direct coordination with those agencies.

Matty, I’m sorry to be the one to tell you that whoever wrote that passage, whether it was you or Mr. Dan Stamper or some lamebrained lawyer on your payroll, well, this is the weakest piece of argument I have ever seen.

For example, this seemingly key sentence: Our efforts to secure one of the nation’s busiest border crossings and one of Michigan’s most valuable economic assets is well within the obligation of the Bridge Company.

That is no authority, Matty. That is just you or your factotum saying this is so because you say it’s so.

Not good enough, Matty.

Think of it this way: What if I went back to Riverside Park and one of your shotgun-carrying bullies tried to kick me out? I’d say, by what authority? What’s the cretin gonna say?

Our efforts to secure one of the nation’s busiest border crossings and one of Michigan’s most valuable economic assets is well within the obligation of the Bridge Company”?

Is that gonna be his line? What a laugh. That’s a big bunch of nothing, Matty.

Or is your hired hooligan gonna parrot, “Homeland security also requires a robust vertical integration of the federal, state, local, and tribal governments, the private and non-profit sectors, and the American citizen to build a secure, safe, and resilient Nation”?

Hokum, Matty.

In fact, it is the lamest excuse for reasoning I’ve seen in a long, long time.

I’d say short on fact, except it has not fact.

It is a long, articulated line of baloney.

Speaking of facts, Matty, listen to this: I just got off the phone with Ron Smith. He’s the public information officer for the Office of Field Operations of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, an agency under the federal Department of Homeland Security that works directly with your people on the Ambassador Bridge.

Know what he told me, Matty?

Key words: “On the bridge.” Not under, but ON the bridge.

Not at Riverside Park next door.

You have no federal authority to be bothering citizens who come to Riverside Park. That includes people like me who take pictures.

Phony "Homeland Security" sign placed by Matty Moroun henchmen on gate to Detroit city park boat ramp. Moroun closed public boat launch, citing bogus "Homeland Security" concerns. Joel Thurtell photo.

Phony "Homeland Security" sign placed by Matty Moroun henchmen on gate to Detroit city park boat ramp. Moroun closed public boat launch, citing bogus "Homeland Security" concerns. Joel Thurtell photo.

Moreover, you have no federal authority for seizing parts of that park and closing off the public boat ramp.

No wonder you didn’t want to answer my letter directly. You had no answer.

Instead, you sent a bogus response to someone else and slyly made sure I got a copy.

Everything about you is sly, matty.

Fact is, Matty, you STOLE that park.

Remember my appeal to what I hoped was the better side of your character to give the park back and fix it up?

Got a feeling it’s too late for generous gestures, Matty.

My city sources have dried up. Not talking to me.

Know what that means, Matty?

I’ll let you and your deputy, Mr. Dan Stamper, figure it out.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Adventures on the Rouge, Lakes and streams, Me & Matty | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Matty’s answer to me, slightly indirect

 

By Joel Thurtell

Here is Matty Moroun’s answer to my letter to him. He had his minion Dan Stamper send it to Deb Sumner, a leader in Southwest Detroit and frequent critic of Moroun.

The letter:

September 30, 2008

Ms. Sumner,

I cannot and will not engage in criticisms, personal attacks or a war of words with someone who is clearly biased against our company.  I respect your opinion and your right to voice that opinion no matter what it may be.  However, I must do my part to make sure that you, along with those within our community, are aware of the facts relating to the Ambassador Bridge and its operations.
For far too long, a small contingent of antagonists around the state has engaged in “Ambassador Bridge bashing” to the delight of those who relish such negative activity.  This consistent, but unnecessary vilification of the Bridge Company and its officials has been filled with many untruths and in some instances flat out lies, all in efforts to launch political careers for some of our most outspoken critics and mislead thousands of others within the community we serve.

Since you took it upon yourself to be so vociferous about what you think of the Bridge Company, I would hope that you would care to learn the facts about us.  Let me take a moment to address some of the most recent misinformation and baseless attacks on the Ambassador Bridge and our operations within Southwest Detroit (SWD).

The horrific events of 9/11 created a coming together of government agencies, along with public and private corporations that own and operate critical infrastructures, in our country.  The changes that have happened at airports, tunnels, seaports, power plants and bridges are staggering, but necessary.  Our participation with all the federal agencies in a coordinated effort to better protect infrastructure and the traveling public is a daily endeavor, and yes, our participation did require creating a buffer zone around the bridge.
For some time now our efforts to secure the bridge have come under fire from a select few who have asserted we are operating outside of our boundaries.  Let me be clear.  Our efforts to secure one of the nation’s busiest border crossings and one of Michigan’s most valuable economic assets is well within the obligation of the Bridge Company.  All of our enhanced security efforts have been implemented in coordination and partnership with all federal agencies who have responsibility to secure our nation’s borders.
Here’s some language directly from a report from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) regarding its Strategic Plan, Fiscal Years 2008 – 2013. As it relates to the DHS’s efforts to preventing “external threats from coming to fruition,” they wrote:

“Building an effective national emergency response system will entail continuing efforts to develop and sustain national partnerships across all levels of government, voluntary organizations, and the private sector…”

In addition, the DHS wrote:
“Homeland security also requires a robust vertical integration of the federal, state, local, and tribal governments, the private and non-profit sectors, and the American citizen to build a secure, safe, and resilient Nation.”
To effectively do this, we have worked with all the security agencies to implement the appropriate measures to adequately secure one of our nation’s critical infrastructures.  All operations and efforts to do so are in direct coordination with those agencies.

Despite your cynical sentiments about the intent of the Ambassador Bridge and its employees, the reality of our post-9/11 world dictates that increased security measures are prudent.  This effort to secure travelers and infrastructure against threats known and unknown continues today and will continue long into the future.
Ms. Sumner, it is my sincere hope that you, along with others who have unnecessarily criticized this company, will take a more prudent approach to determining what’s best for SWD and the rest of the state.  Your criticisms against the Ambassador Bridge and its staff dismiss or ignore the importance of securing critical infrastructure in our nation and the potential threat to its citizens and way of life.  It is apparent your criticisms are only personal in nature.

Assuming that you are truly committed to what’s best for SWD, I think that you should agree that it is past time for all of us to begin working together to determine the best course of action for the future benefit of SWD and the state, rather than tear each other down in an attempt to create further conflict which stifles progress.

If we can set aside individual agendas for one minute, I believe we can build on the success of the Ambassador Bridge Gateway Project and continue to improve the community and this international corridor without negative impacts to Southwest Detroit.
The Ambassador Bridge is, and will continue to be, a vital part of the SWD community with a vested interest in helping to assure its future economic growth and prosperity.  We care deeply about the SWD community and will continue to do our part to be a strong and involved corporate citizen.

Sincerely,

Dan Stamper

Posted in Me & Matty, People | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

Dear Matty,…

BYOW

Bring Your Own Water to the softball game at 5 p.m. Wednesday, October 1, 2008 at Riverview Extension Park in Detroit. Park is on 23rd Street a block south of Fort. Game is meant to assert public right to use a park where Ambassador BRidge tycoon Matty Moroun’s guards hassle people away.

[donation]

By Joel Thurtell

Detroit's Riverside Park near Ambassador Bridge. Benches line the walkway alongside the Detroit River. You can watch boats on the river and see Windsor. There is a boat launch, too, but it's been closed by Ambassador Bridge owner Matty Moroun. Joel Thurtell photo.

Detroit's Riverside Park near Ambassador Bridge. Benches line the walkway alongside the Detroit River. You can watch boats on the river and see Windsor. There is a boat launch, too, but it's been closed by Ambassador Bridge owner Matty Moroun. Joel Thurtell photo.

From: Joel Thurtell, Former Journalist

To: Matty Moroun, Billionaire

Dear Matty,

I want to thank your assistant, Mr. Dan Stamper, for being so kind as to send me a letter criticizing me for defending the City of Detroit’s formerly public Riverside Park, parts of which you have seized. Mr. Stamper also takes the park itself to task for not being more inviting to people who might want to use it as a public park, though he denies what I believe to be true, which is that people stay away for fear of being hassled by your guards the way one of them harassed me.

I must say, Mr. Stamper was very perceptive in his letter when he referred to me as a “former journalist.” Based upon my observations of the REAL journalists, as in staff writers for the two Detroit dailies, if I were one of them and not a former journalist, I never would have written my story last week headlined, “Please don’t look at these pictures!”

REAL Detroit journalists don’t have time to write about you, Matty. I understand that their reporters are “too busy” to write about you.

But my status as a journalist or not isn’t the reason I’m writing to you.

I’m writing to you because I assume that whatever Mr. Stamper put in his letter to me reflects what you told him to write. I thought I would eliminate the middle man.

First, despite your claim that you took over parts of Riverside Park and blocked access to its

This chain-link gate blocks access to the former public boat ramp at Detroit's Riverside Parak. The fence was placed there by Ambassador Bridge owner Matty Moroun. Joel Thurtell photo.

This chain-link gate blocks access to the former public boat ramp at Detroit's Riverside Park. The fence was placed there by Ambassador Bridge owner Matty Moroun. Joel Thurtell photo.

formerly public boat launch at the behest of the federal Department of Homeland Security, I understand from city officials that you closed the park several months after 9/11 and without authority from the federal government. I would be interested in seeing the orders or authority you received calling for closing off part of the park. can’t find anyone in Homeland Security who knows anything about your closing of Riverside Park.

Second, your long description of how poorly maintained the park is, and how few people use it, is a tip of your hand, Matty. It tells me that you have some other use in mind for the park and plan to take over more of it. You have already proven that you can block public access to the basketball courts in Riverside Park Extension and to the boat launch at the main Riverside Park, and the city won’t object. What’s next?

What does a billionaire want with a little park in a city full of people who can use every scrap of green space they can find? Add to that the beautiful view you get from the actual river side of Riverside Park, and I’m at a loss as to why you would want to take that away.

You know what? I think you secretly agree with me. I see a hint of altruism in Mr. Stamper’s letter to me.

The altruism I see is your offer of free bottled water to people who plan to play softball in Riverside Extension Park at 5 p.m. Wednesday, October 1, 2008 at 23rd Street a block south of Fort.

I know my real journalist friends will accuse me of being a naive former journalist. But I believe I sense in that offer of free bottled water a sign of your own desire to give something back to the community.

Oh, sure, it’s only bottled water, and some will say the offer itself is meant as a big raspberry to the organizers of the softball game, and to its players.

But I can’t believe that someone as wealthy and powerful as you are would have such an insatiable appetite for taking over other people’s land that you wouldn’t stop and reflect that maybe now is the time to quit doing that. Maybe now is the time for you to give something real and tangible to the people of Detroit.

Instead of delivering bottles of water, why don’t you send some workers to dismantle that fence at Riverside Extension Park? Send some trucks to relocate the gravel so people can play basketball again. Send  guard to unlock those padlocks at the entrance to the boat ramp.

You would actually be fooling people, if that is what you like to do. You would be doing something that is totally unexpected. You would be giving the park back to the city before they can sue you to take it back. They will be astonished if you do that.

But you could astound them even more. How about — with the city’s permission, of course — giving that ball diamond a do-over, maybe even setting up some bleachers? How about building a decent bathroom with running water and flush toilets so people wouldn’t have to use that porta-john?

How about re-paving the boat launch and putting some nice new docks in?

How about donating some picnic tables and maybe some charcoal grills, too?

Be a billionaire with heart, Matty.

What do you say?

Yours truly,

Joel Thurtell, Former Journalist

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Adventures on the Rouge, Joel's J School, Lakes and streams, Me & Matty | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Letter from Dan Stamper

September 26, 2008
Joel, while it is clear that you have an axe to grind with Matty Moroun, it is still incredible how grossly misinformed you are regarding what is going on with Riverside Park.  While you are certainly entitled to your opinion about what goes on in Detroit, I would hope that as a former journalist, you just might do a little more research and be a little more objective with what you present.

Here is a little information that would hopefully alter some of your misguided notions regarding the operations of the Ambassador Bridge (AB) and Riverside Park.
After 9/11, AB officials were approached by Homeland Security to work in coordination with U.S. Customs and Border Protection to enhance security around this border crossing.  This resulted in the security of the AB’s infrastructure being the responsibility of bridge officials.  In order to secure it adequately, AB officials were given permission to create a security buffer around the bridge in this most vulnerable area in order to protect the infrastructure as best it could.

The reality: both private and public security officials assessed the area to create an adequate perimeter necessary to secure the infrastructure, as a direct result of the charge given from Homeland Security. Yes, both private and public security can and do work together to secure our border crossing and despite their necessary efforts to adequately secure this important international crossway, almost 90% of the park is still open for public use.
These “goons”, as you have described them, are protecting the people of two nations and the billions of dollars in commerce that tracks everyday across one of Michigan’s most precious assets.  To characterize them as non-essential henchman carrying out the work of some grim overlord is a little over the top.
The fact of the matter is you were encroaching upon a sensitive area of one of the world’s busiest international border crossings, which in a post-9/11 world is a serious matter.  The security staff you encountered do indeed work with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, (CBP), Border Patrol, FBI and the equivalent agencies in Canada.  Had you respected his authority and stuck around long enough, you would have found that out.
As for the use of Riverside Park, did you ask your City officials sources, what were their plans for the park?  Unfortunately, Riverside has been in decline for well over a decade and was closed by the City long before the security fences were installed with City permission.  The closest residential area to the park is almost 10 blocks away.  For several years now the City has steered all athletic activities to neighboring parks such as Fort Wayne and Clark.

It wasn’t too long ago that the City stopped using the incinerator adjacent to Riverside as a part of the City’s old dog pound operations.

As additional evidence of the lack of visitors and investment of Riverside, you should take a glance at a comprehensive study conducted by the University of Michigan and the National Wildlife Federation that stated: “While the park’s unique riverfront location offers views of the Detroit River and the Ambassador Bridge, it has become an undervalued and neglected public space.”  The study went on to conclude that: “Feelings of a lack of comfort emerged as a major barrier to park use. This lack of comfort stems from perceptions that the park is neglected, unsafe, and incompatible with users’ physical needs.”

Yes, I think everyone would agree that Riverside Park is a great public space that has awesome potential.  However, the stark reality is that this area along the riverfront has been in transition for quite some time.

The reality: Riverside Park is one of the City’s least used parks and the City officials have made a commitment to do something else with it as a part of its future neighborhood and riverfront development plans.  To assert that the lack of visitors and use of this park is due to necessary security efforts is a stretch.  Also, you should be aware that the Ambassador Bridge is working with and is on their Board of Directors of the Riverfront Conservancy and will help them accomplish their goals of bringing back the river front to the public.

Joel, it is clear that you are a strong booster of Detroit, and so I can appreciate your zeal in telling others about the things that are important to you.  However, this City has enough fighting going on as is, so it’s baffling that you would want to add to that negativity.

Why do you, in your own words, want to engage in a ‘bout with Matty Moroun?’  I don’t know your history with Detroit, but I don’t think any of us can ever question each others love and devotion to this city.  Matty is one of Detroit’s most staunch advocates and biggest cheerleaders, as I assume you are.  I think your time would be better spent focusing on the positives and our commonalities as opposed to setting out to stir up unnecessary trouble and instigating negative sentiments.

If you are going to have a baseball game, the Ambassador Bridge would be pleased to supply soft drinks for the participants.  Please let my office know of the exact time and estimate of the number of people that will be present.
Dan Stamper

Posted in Beginnings | 1 Comment

Like public radio, sort of

[donation]

By Joel Thurtell

Hey. folks! In case, you’ve been wondering what it’s for, that “donation” button above my by-line actually works.

Yep, there are people out there in the blogosphere who have actually used that button to contribute money to the operation of joelontheroad.

One donor referred to my recent column about job shifts among Detroit Free Press management. He wrote:

Joel,

I just wanted to drop you a quick note to say how much I enjoy your blog. After 21 years in the newspaper business, I just got fed up and left (resigned on the spot). I still freelance, but I work out of home and I don’t have to deal with the insanity of clueless upper management.

Your description of Ron Dzwonkowski as an editor struck a chord as I have worked for some editors I would gladly go through a wall for and rave about the taste of drywall. They encouraged, challenged and made me a better overall journalist. Ron sounds like one of those editors.

Sadly, those folks have been replaced by corporate sycophants who would gladly throw a reporter under a DOT bus at the first whiff of controversy.

All the best,


Larry O’Connor

Larry was a reporter with the Observer & Eccentric papers and later worked for the Jackson Citizen-Patriot.

Thank you very much, Larry.

And to others who have contributed either money, time or advice, I also say thanks. The help, be it financial, or simply a positive comment, email or phone call, is a great reassurance to me that my work is filling a need.

It’s especially gratifying to receive monetary contributions, because it makes me feel like I have actual, paying subscribers.

I can’t possibly exaggerate the impact — It propels me to think more, write more and consider new ways to make this site interesting and useful.

The fact is, folks, there isn’t enough time in teh day for me to write every story I think of. But I try.

There are nights, or rather mornings, when I find myself writing well past my bed time. Since I always get up at six in the morning to make coffee foe me and my wife, read the Free Press and Times and work on my books, the wee hours bedtimes sometimes force an afternoon snooze. Just before I doze off, I often think of a new story angle.

Couldn’t write and doze and write at the Free Press!

Two of the people who have helped me most are my sons, Adam and Abe. Adam shepherded me into a new version of WordPress back in July and helped me to start a new site, www.shoestringreporter.com. The Shoestring site will help sell my Journalism anti-textbook when it’s ready to print. My son Abe ushered me into the Web world in 1996 when he created my ham radio equipment sales site. He or Adam coach me on every new step I take into the Internet.

As I say, that “donation” button sure works. It’s been tested. Don’t be shy.

Think of it like public radio — you like what you hear, you want it to keep coming, so you pay to make sure it stays with you.

Well, joelontheroad is like that. It’s pretty much a volunteer effort by me right now. But the more help I get of any kind, the better this site will be.

Drop me a line — or a nickel — at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Bloggery, Joel's J School | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Assets for sale!

[donation]

By joel Thurtell

Just came back from a reconnaisance mission.

In my garage.

The news is good!

I have assets for sale, too. Just like those big Wall Street banks.

I heard this trillion dollar federal bailout of the investment industry is spreading the wealth far and wide. It started out with bad mortgages the government was going to buy up to make sure the banks that wrote all that bad paper and deserved to fail would instead live and breathe and prosper.

But now every investment bank with any kind of bad investment paper is getting into the act. This is the land of opportunity!

According to my pal Bert Ely, any kind of asset will do. Bert was quoted in the September 22, 2008 New York Times because he’s “a financial services industry consultant in Alexandria, Virginia.” I don’t really know Bert, but I’d like to, cause he’s barking right up my tree.

Here’s what the Times said about Bert: “Mr. Ely said the open-ended nature of the Treasury’s plan could be interpreted to mean that the government was open to acquiring ‘any asset, anywhere in the world.’ ”

Bert is my kind of guy. When I read the government would buy “any asset, anywhere in the world,” the first place I thought of was my garage.

Man, have I got a lot of assets out there.

An old Schwinn bike, a big can of sunflower seeds for the birds, some power tools like a band saw, a table saw, a shaper and a router, lots of sailboat hardware like cam cleats, turnbuckles, silicon bronze and stainless steel screws of all sizes, an old desk we don’t have room for in the house, a little table that got squeezed out of the shed, four or five long extension cords, one with an incandescent light bulb at an end, various pieces of ham radio equipment I couldn’t unload on eBay, a car jack, some old rakes that are pretty worn out, a short-handled shovel and lots more.

Most of these assets, I think, are worth more than the derivatives my Wall Street colleagues are hawking to the government.

Here’s my plan: I’m going to make up some really high prices for these things. (Oh, by the way, I’ve got tons of old books, too!) I’m going to sell them to the government and maybe discount them a little bit. But I’ll more than make up the difference by charging the government a brokerage fee which I deserve for making this swell deal possible.

Do me a favor: Don’t tell anybody else about my plan. If other people start selling their garage junk to the government, I may be squeezed out.

Drop me a line at joelontheroad.com

Posted in Bad government | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

I want a bailout, too!

[donation]

By Joel Thurtell

Hey, how do I cash in on this bailout deal?

I mean, for chrissake, I’m gonna be paying for it, right?

According to economic prognosticators, I’m gonna be paying thousands of buckos over the years.

What does that make me?

A chump?

Or an investor?

I want to be an investor.

I want to know that my thousands of dollars will net me a return on my investment.

Why shouldn’t I feel that way?

It’s the way Wall Street sees it.

What a bunch of heroes they are, in my view.

Geniuses, too!

Think of it this way — these guys engineered us into a huge mess, scaring President George W. Bush so much he stopped reading his goat book and popped for a trillion dollar bailout that runs counter to everything his good Republican upbringing makes him believe in.

Actually, in an eye blink, he figured out the bailout was a great thing for Republicans, many of whom live on Wall Street and put together this perfect storm of a financial mess that requires a bailout that will be managed by the same geniuses who created the perfect financial storm!

Brilliant!

But doggonit, I want a piece of the action.

It’s been promised to me.

Here’s how I figure it: Treasury Secretary Henry (I’m gonna call him Hank) Paulson Jr. says in the New York Times on September 22, 2008 that the bailout was “needed not just for Wall Street, but for all Americans.”

That is an indirect quote made up — I mean — put together by the team of three reporters who wrote the Page One story under the head, DEMOCRATS SET CONDITIONS AS TREASURY CHIEF RALLIES SUPPORT FOR BAILOUT PLAN.

Well, he sure will get MY support. If he’ll just tell me how I can cash in.

That story trailed under the subhead, OVERSIGHT IS ISSUE.

You bet oversight is an issue. I want some oversight into how I can make a buck off this debacle.

No, I mean I want more than a buck. I’ve been promised a lot more, according to the neighboring story under the subhead, “Big Financiers Start Lobbying For Wider Aid.”

You bet we’re lobbying. This is an entitlement. See, since the government isn’t going to oversee the buying up of every asset in sight, Hank plans to parcel the work out to his cronies, I mean associates, on guess where?

Wall Street, the same bunch of yokels and yahoos who engineered this marvelous disaster that will bail us all into untold riches if we’re smart.

According to this other Times article, “Investment firms were jockeying to oversee all the assets that Treasury plans to take off the books of financial institutions, a role that could earn them hundreds of millions of dollars a year in fees.”

Wow! Isn’t that grand?

Hundreds of millions of dollars in fees!

I’ll take it. Think about that. I’m going to invest a paltry few thousand bucks over a few years, like every other taxpayer, to help pay down this bailout.

But I have a chance now, if I move fast, to collect up front hundreds of millions of dollars.

And pay back only a few thousand?

I’d be a chump not to jump for it.

Here’s the problem: How do I get to be an investment banker?

Quick, goddamit, hurry up! We don’t have all day. Anybody know how I can do that?

I have a lot to offer. I’ve tested out my theories at home, and they work pretty well: My wife says I’m an expert at creating financial havoc.

So if anybody needs another financial mess to be bailed out of, I’m your man.

If you have an idea how I can cash in, drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Bad government | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Matty on my mind

[donation]

By Joel Thurtell

Now I know how Detroit Free Press editors must have felt when they saw how many website hits

Oops! You're not supposed to see a photo of this truck going over Matty Moroun's privately-owned Ambassador Bridge linking Detroit and Windsor. Joel Thurtell photo.

Oops! You're not supposed to see a photo of this truck going over Matty Moroun's privately-owned Ambassador Bridge linking Detroit and Windsor. Joel Thurtell photo.

their bombshell Kwame Kilpatrick stories were igniting.

Joelontheroad.com, with my story about being ejected from a public park by a private security guard hired by trucking magnate Manuel “Matty” Moroun, showed a record number of hits for Wednesday, September 24.

No brainer: Gotta write more Matty Moroun stories!

It shows a widespread revulsion for this man who puts his own financial interests over everything, including the law.

Even without the surge in interest for JOTR, I’d be looking more closely at this wealthy man who seems to have created his own parallel reality.

 

Ambassador Bridge and trucking tycoon Matty Moroun put counterfeit "Homeland Security" signs on city property to keep people out of a public parak he's now using as a dump for gravel and other construction materials. City officials say the federal government did not authorize the signs or seizure of the park. Joel Thurtell photo.

Ambassador Bridge and trucking tycoon Matty Moroun put counterfeit "Homeland Security" signs on city property to keep people out of a public parak he's now using as a dump for gravel and other construction materials. City officials say the federal government did not authorize the signs or seizure of the park. Joel Thurtell photo.

It’s an alternate universe where Matty Moroun makes the law or breaks the law and does what he wants. Why, this self-proclaimed caesar hung counterfeit Homeland Security signs on chain-link fences he put up on a city park to close off part of it.

 

Take the matter of hazardous industrial materials — corrosives, explosives, volatile chemicals, fuels — the sort of thing you don’t want sitting on a vulnerable bridge. Federal law sanely bans trucks from moving hazmat over bridges.

But Matty does it.

Since he owns the bridge, he argues that he can keep state troopers off the Ambassador. He issues special permits to truckers, letting them carry hazmat over his bridge in defiance of the law. Since several large trucking firms are owned by Matty, it saves him having to pay the Detroit-Windsor Truck Ferry to carry hazmat legally between Windsor and Detroit.

Cute guy, this Matty.

If you want to learn more about Matty, see the November 2004 Forbes magazine story by Stephane Fitch and Joann Muller, “The Troll Under the Bridge.”

Matty didn’t let the writers interview him. But the two journalistic sleuths dug up plenty on him.

They point out that the Ambassador is 75 years old, its four lanes too narrow for today’s vehicles, yet it’s located a very short distance from Canada, with the closest alternative bridge two truck-ride hours away.

Forty percent of all truck shipments from the U.S. to Canada use the Ambassador.

A privately-owned bridge controlling all that traffic, dictating tolls and telling the government its owner can decide what kind of materials will go over it, with virtually no regulation?

Wonder why we don’t read this kind of thorough reporting about a key Michigan businessman in either of the Detroit dailies? The Windsor Star does an admirable job covering him.

I hear Detroit’s city law department is mulling whether to sue Matty to give them back a city park and public boat launch he seized. Well, you know my take on that: Why sue when you own the park? Just kick the troll out, along with his shotgun-packin’ thugs.

I understand people may organize some kind of lawful activity at Riverside Park. I’ll post a notice of any park events when I hear about them. Or not. Keep ol’ Matty guessin’!

Since posting my first column about how Matty’s goon forced me to leave Riverside Park Extension on Monday, September 22, I’ve heard from other people who have been pushed illegally out of the park by Matty’s hirelings. A reader reported being harassed by Matty’s gunslingers at the park the very day before it happened to me. He was held till a Border Patrol officer came, demanded to see his ID and kept him around for half an hour. See my Comments section for more reports like this.

I’m told one of the people ejected from this public park was a city recreation official. Astounding,

Ambassador Bridge owner Matty Moroun's private security guards kicked a city of Detroit recreation official out of this public park, Riverside Park Extension, two times. Joel Thurtell photo.

Ambassador Bridge owner Matty Moroun's private security guards kicked a city of Detroit recreation official out of this public park, Riverside Park Extension, two times. Joel Thurtell photo.

isn’t it?

What’s more astounding is that the city let it happen. Didn’t send the rec worker back with a police escort.

I wonder why the city didn’t assign some plainclothes cops to watch the two parks and arrest Matty’s guard dogs for harassing people?

Well, I hear Matty and Kwame were buddies, and Matty’s pals with Kwame’s mommy, as well. She’s Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick, the congresswoman who represents a Detroit district with the Ambassador Bridge.

But Kwame’s gone. Maybe things will change. I’m told the city has to evict Matty, even though he stole their park.

Security guard who ordered me out of City of Detroit public Riverside Park Extension on Monday, September 22, 2008. This is the guy who was carting a shotgun on the front seat of the pickup. Joel Thurtell photo.

Security guard who ordered me out of City of Detroit public Riverside Park Extension on Monday, September 22, 2008. This is the guy who was carting a shotgun on the front seat of the pickup. Joel Thurtell photo.

Hey, what about that shotgun on the front passenger seat beside “Doug,” the L.S.S. guard who tried to arrest and hold me for the Border Patrol?

What is the legality or lack thereof when someone not a certified municipal or state police officer keeps a shotgun loose in a car?

Matty is not the only magnate willing to make public property his own.

SeverStal Steel, owned by the Russians and ultimately controlled by Russian dictator Vladimir Putin, is trying to make the Rouge River into its own private waterway. When I cruised past their steel mile on Friday, September 18, in my motorboat, a security guard ordered me to get out, claiming it is a “Marine Security Area.” Boaters have to stay out.

Utter bullshit.

 

Freighter docked on Rouge River near spot where SeverStal steel mill security guard ordered me to leave as I cruised the freighter slip in my motorboat September 19, 2008. Guard claimed slip is "Marine Security Area." Coast Guards says that was a lie and boaters have "absolute" right to be on the river. Joel Thurtell photo.

Freighter docked on Rouge River near spot where SeverStal steel mill security guard ordered me to leave as I cruised the freighter slip in my motorboat September 19, 2008. Guard claimed slip is "Marine Security Area." Coast Guards says that was a lie and boaters have "absolute" right to be on the river. Joel Thurtell photo.

I just talked to a U.S. Coast Guard officer, Lt. J.G. Paul Raska in Detroit, who told me the goon — excuse me, guard — at SeverStal had “absolutely” no authority for kicking me out of a public area.

 

“As long as you’re in the water, you’re okay,” Lt. Raska said.

SeverStal has authority “once you set foot on the ground or touch their dock, but as long as you’re in the water, absolutely, you have a right to be there. As long as you don’t tie up, you’re okay. That is a public waterway and everybody has a right to be there.”

That’s great, except for one thing: In both cases, at SeverStal and at the city park, the guards won. They got me to leave.

So what’s to be done?

It would be great if the city took back its park and opened its boat ramp.

But how do we get SeverStal to obey the law and stop harassing boaters?

 

One of Matty Moroun's fake "Homeland Security" signs hangs from padlocked gate of Detroit's Riverside Park public boat launch closed by Moroun. Joel Thurtell photo.

One of Matty Moroun's fake "Homeland Security" signs hangs from padlocked gate of Detroit's Riverside Park public boat launch closed by Moroun. Joel Thurtell photo.

I’m concerned that something bigger and more ominous is going on. Big surprise. The Bush administration and Congress have watered down civil rights wholesale, using 9/11 as an excuse. Wiretapping goes on legally now, because Congress lacked the guts to oppose a dictatorial president; We kissed habeas corpus goodbye long ago, thanks to Bush, Congress and a right-dominated U.S. Supreme Court.

 

It should come as no shock that businesses are trying to push people off public waterways and out of public parks.

It’s time for people to do something about the erosion of civil rights. Maybe these private attempts to foreclose our access to public places are where we can take a stand.

 

Padlock on gate of Detroit's supposedly public Riverside Park boat launch shut down by order of Ambassador Bridge owner Matty Moroun. Joel Thurtell photo.

Padlock on gate of Detroit's supposedly public Riverside Park boat launch shut down by order of Ambassador Bridge owner Matty Moroun. Joel Thurtell photo.

Yes, certainly hold a softball game at Riverside Park Extension.

 

Or let’s pilot a flotilla of motorboats into the SeverStal docking area.

But then what?

Ideas?

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Adventures on the Rouge, Kwamegate, Lakes and streams, Me & Matty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments