My kind of Socialism

My kind of Socialism
11/11/08

[donation]

By Joel Thurtell

GM, Ford Motor Co., Chrysler LLC and the UAW have asked for $50 billion in aid for the industry — $25 billion for general business use and $25 billion to put toward the UAW’s trust fund for retiree health care.

— Detroit Free Press, November 11, 2008

You can’t live in Auto Alley and not be aware that employees of the Big Three car makers, whether they’re managers or blue-collar union workers, have a pretty cushy deal.

Present tense — HAVE a pretty cushy deal, because despite descending to beggar status with their plea for billions in federal aid, the autoworkers have locked in this year’s raises and bonuses.

It’s a point of pride, something to flaunt, that their wages far exceed the norm and they get perks, aka “benefits,” that are the envy of other workers, even those union members who belong to other than UAW locals.

In fact, most workers outside auto manufacturing, and this includes non-auto-related white-collar workers, don’t enjoy benefits that come close to those common in the auto industry.

When it comes to health insurance, most people pay through the nose. And when they get old, they have Medcaid and Medicare, two federally-funded programs open to all which we have thanks to Lyndon Johnson with a posthumous prod from Franklin Roosevelt.

But below retirement age, there are some 43 million Americans who have no health insurance.

None whatsoever.

Now, when the automakers were self-supporting, it was a little hard to say their employees shouldn’t enjoy the best of benefits.

But today, the Big Three are broke, or nearly so, depending on which of the trio of mendicants you look at.

They’re broke, yet they want U.S. taxpayers to pick up the burden of the promises managers and union leaders made during the boom times when their workers had — still have — the sweetest pay, the sweetest retirement, the sweetest health care deals in the country.

Now that Detroit can no longer afford to keep those luxurious promises, the bosses want us — that is, the vast majority of Americans who never had those gold-plated deals — to pay for maintaining auto workers in the style to which they have become accustomed.

Why should taxpayers foot the bill for perks that most of us could never dream of?

Twenty-five billion smackers to support retiree health care?

Sorry, autoworkers — get in line with the rest of us.

I’m not saying UAW members don’t deserve these health benefits.

I am saying that they’re no more deserving than any other American.

The rest of us will be using Medicare and Medicaid. Is that not good enough for workers at the Big Three? If not, why not improve those benefits so we can all enjoy them?

Instead of perpetuating this elite cadre of employees with a $25 billion gift card, why not invest the money in a system that guarantees universal health care for everyone of any age?

I mean a single-payer system like other rational industrial countries have.

That’s right, cut the private insurance companies out entirely.

Oh, I can hear the howls.

Why should health care be a for-profit undertaking?

We have a chance, right now. It’s all the buzz now to say we shouldn’t waste a crisis. Well, let’s use this crisis to start fixing health care from the bottom up, from pre-natal to geriatric.

Does this make me a Socialist?

Fine with me.

Hey, if President Bush and his treasury secretary, Henry Paulson, can nationalize the banking, insurance and housing industry, why not call that Socialist?

And why not federalize the health care industry as well?

No more elites. We’re all in it together.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Auto bailout | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The bomb under the Ambassador

The bomb under the Ambassador
11/11/08

By Joel Thurtell

Forbes Magazine once referred to Detroit Ambassador Bridge owner Manuel “Matty” Moroun as “the troll under the bridge.”

There’s no troll under that bridge.

What’s under the Ambassador Bridge is a bomb.

And no, I’m not talking about the unexploded rocket-propelled grenade police divers found last week in the Detroit River not far from the bridge.

It’s unsettling to learn that someone actually got hold of a grenade, a military weapon, let alone dropped it in the river a couple hundred yards from a bridge that carries one-fourth of the goods that pass between the U.S. and Canada.

But believe me, that rocket-propelled grenade is a mere firecracker compared to what Ambassador Bridge owner and international trucking tycoon Manuel (Matty) Moroun has tucked under the U.S. side of his span.

Three hundred thousand gallons of explosives.

Oh, Matty doesn’t call it a bomb.

He calls it a money-maker.

Three hundred thousand gallons of gasoline and diesel fuel, stored under the elevated U.S. approach to the bridge, for sale at pumps outside Matty’s duty-free Ammex store.

An explosion at the bridge could kill lots of people and cut truck movement between two countries.

On the other hand, Matty makes a lot money selling gas.

Check it out at the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality website — it’s Facility ID 00035589 at 3400 W. Lafayette in Detroit. The owner is Matty’s Ammex, Inc. The record shows 17 underground gasoline and diesel fuel tanks ranging in size between 20,000 and 30,000 gallons on the MDEQ “Storage Tank Facilities List.”.

Readers of joelontheroad.com may recall how late in September I went looking for a city of Detroit boat launch that I’d heard was closed down by Matty, citing security concerns for the bridge.

One of Matty’s shotgun-toting goons tried to detain me as I took pictures of the bridge from publicly-owned Riverside Park. Supposedly, I posed some kind of threat to the bridge.

Talk about threats to the bridge. Can you believe it? Every day, Matty’s serving a Molotov cocktail of 60,000 gallons gas and 240,000 gallons diesel fuel.

A rocket-propelled grenade by itself couldn’t wreck the Ambassador bridge. But a rocket shot at those fuel bunkers would be a different story. The number of grenades needed to render the Ambassador Bridge a useless, smoldering ruin would be approximately one.

But who needs an RPG?

That Ammex store has all the detonators a terrorist would need.

How about a lit cigarette?

Or a BIC lighter?

Munitions by Matty.

All the makings of a big boom, sold at a profit by Matty Moroun.

I wonder — Why does the city of Detroit, why does the county of Wayne, why does the state of Michigan, why does the federal government let Matty Moroun house a bomb under his bridge?

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Me & Matty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bailout bonuses

Bailout bonuses
11/11/08

[donation]

By Joel Thurtell

The company (Ford) will also eliminate merit pay and bonuses next year.

— Detroit Free Press, November 8, 2008

The automaker (Ford) is moving to increase its cash by as much as $17 billion by cutting more jobs, eliminating bonuses for salaried workers in 2009 and reducing its capital expenditures.

— New York Times, November 8, 2008

Talk about chutzpah.

Talk about shameless posturing.

I’m trying to get this straight. The Big Three automakers have been crying desperately poor for months and months.

Hats in hand, the car makers along with their principle union, the UAW, have been lobbying Washington politicians seeking a multi-billion dollar publicly-paid rescue of their industry.

Doesn’t it seem like companies that are asking for billions in taxpayer-funded charity would at least have the decency to quit giving their staff merit raises and bonuses?

Yet we learn that despite its claimed desperation, Ford Motor Co. has been paying merit raises and bonuses this year — at the same time Ford, General Motors and Chrysler are making their case for a federal handout.

The Big Three have already cut thousands of hourly workers and salaried staff, shuttered numerous plants, yet they still couldn’t see removing merit pay and bonuses as a priority?

The Big Three are failing. Yet they continue rewarding managers with bonuses and raises?

It doesn’t occur to them that it might be stupid and unseemly to keep rewarding people who collectively are making this failure possible.

Why are they rewarding themselves for failure?

Well, because nobody is stopping them.

We are told that the loss of even one of these industrial giants would be terribly destructive to our national economy. They need to be propped up with government largesse because they are TOO BIG TO FAIL.

Maybe.

Or maybe they are TOO BIG TO SUCCEED.

Too well-paid.

Now we’re hearing that they are not only too big to fail, but GM CEO Rick Wagoner claims even filing for bankruptcy would be devastating — who would buy a car from a bankrupt automaker?

Good point. Something Wagoner might have thought about long ago, when GM was churning out high-profit, gas-guzzling Suburbans and Hummers instead of catching a hint from Honda down there in Marysville, Ohio with its fuel-efficient Civics and Accords. Somehow, Honda, Toyota, Subaru and a flock of other foreign-owned automakers are still afloat and not begging for handouts.

Anything to be learned there, Rick?

Nah. Nothing to be learned when you reward continued failure with merit raises and bonuses.

Here’s why I think a Chapter 11 bankruptcy could be a good thing for Detroit and Dearborn.

There would be no infusion of free money that current managers could throw away on more bonuses for buddies.

Instead, the top guys at Ford, GM and Chrysler would be out. A federal judge would appoint a creditors’ committee to oversee rebuilding the business. A judge might appoint a monitor who could act as a receiver, with power to make and break contracts including agreements with suppliers and, yes, gasp, unions.

I’m thinking of what happened in the 1980s when the little town of Ecorse, Michigan went bankrupt. The city’s officials had perks like taxpayer-paid cars, secretaries, an ice rink and bloated police and fire overtime payments that they refused to forego, even though they couldn’t pay their utility bills. A Wayne County judge appointed a receiver who was a dictator. The city council and mayor had no power. The receiver slashed the perks, broke the union contracts, closed the ice rink and put the city in the black.

Great success story. Well, after elected officials took over, they managed to steer the city back into the red.

It would be too bad if that happened to the carmakers. But remember Chrysler — they got a bailout two decades ago, and now they’re back, beggars again.

We can’t afford to think that far out now. The tough decisions need to be made soon.

Somehow, the culture of gimme that commands Detroit has to be replaced with a rational approach to automaking. Short-term profiteering has to give way to long-term planning.

Who’s gonna do it? It’s evident that the people running those companies haven’t got a clue how to fix themselves.

Help has to come from outside. It will never be accepted willingly by the Rick Wagoners who are still clutching at power and are so so so fearful of bankruptcy.

What Rick really fears about bankruptcy is losing control, like the mayor of Ecorse lost control when a judge appointed a receiver.

The best thing for Detroit and Dearborn right now would be a dictator who could tell the CEOs to take a hike.

The new super boss could impose real austerity, dig deep into the fat that remains, cut, cut, cut. And make real plans for manufacturing really fuel-efficient cars that would overtake the foreign models and put Made in USA back in business.

And oh yes, the new czar should put those bonuses in a black hole where they won’t be seen till the companies turn a profit.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Auto bailout | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tech troubles

Tech troubles
11/05/08

By Joel Thurtell

Got a call from a fan this evening.

She wondered, Why haven’t I posted a new column in several days?

Good question.

It’s not for lack of material.

Fact is, I’m having some problems uploading photos.

This whole blog thing is not exactly a natural fit for me. I’ve needed lots of help from both my sons to become even mildly blog savvy.

I have a column ready. I considered just putting it up sans art.

But it would be oh-so much better with the pictures.

No way am I posting it as text only.

Sorry.

In a couple days, the technical problems will be overcome. I’ve been assured of this by my chief techie, who happens to be my son, Adam.

Back in July, Adam helped me step out of the Stone Age of bloggery by updating my WordPress and showing me how to upload photos.

When we run into problems neither of us can figure out, my younger son Abe is the troubleshooter. He’s the University of Michigan computer science major.

We think we’ve figured out why I no longer can put photos up.

Friday is D-Day for making the changes.

I’m keeping my fingers crossed.

The good stuff is piling up, waiting to be published.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Bloggery | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Saving the Big Three

Saving the Big Three
11/05/08

[donation]

By Joel Thurtell

You might say I live in the belly of the Big Three. When I first moved to Plymouth in 1985, the town seemed solidly Ford country. I assumed it was because there was a Ford plant in town and others nearby, with Ford World Headquarters in Dearborn an easy jaunt by freeway.

Most of my neighbors either worked directly for Ford, or took advantage of big discounts buying Fords through connections with relatives who work at the automaker.

These days, there still are lots of Fords, but I also see plenty of Hondas, Toyotas, Subarus, Kias, VWs and Beemers. Why, we have a pair of Hondas parked in our driveway.

Other towns with General Motors or Chrysler plants still have lots of GM and Chrysler cars in their garages, though since ’85 the number of foreign-mark cars has increased there, too.

A relative who works for Ford chides me now and then for buying Hondas. It’s true that once we used that family link to buy a Ford Windstar on the company’s A plan. The Windstar was a fine car, after Ford worked out the kinks. Soon after we bought it, Ford took it back for a month as their engineers tried to figure out why the car would suddenly race ahead without pressure on the accelerator. Very scary.

But Ford eventually figured out the problem and fixed it. We had the Windstar for several years and liked the car.

We also owned a series of Plymouth and Dodge minivans. Wonderful, spacious cars. Their only downfall was the tendency of the transmissions to fail. Once, it happened at 12,000 miles on my birthday. Unforgettable.

My relative who works for Ford told me, “Ford needs help. We need people to buy our cars.”

There was something a bit wrong about that statement. Finally, I figured it out: I actually BUY cars, whereas employees of automakers, be they white or blue collar workers, get incredibly sweet deals. Ownership is heavily subsidized. and autoworkers switch cars so often, they don’t have to worry about their plants’ products falling apart.

Whereas I do.

If the auto worker who criticizes me for my Hondas were paying full price for a car, same as me, I might listen harder. But this buying field is not level. Why should I feel guilty for buying a non-Big Three car when I don’t enjoy the privilege of the sharp discounts autoworkers get?

My second impression is that I’m being mistaken for some charitable organization whose sole purpose is to help automobile manufacturers who got themselves in trouble by reaping big profits on gas guzzling Explorers, Suburbans and Humvees only to stumble when fuel prices jumped into the stratosphere.

In fact, I’m a former journalist now retired who’s trying to make financial ends meet. Buying a new car at the beginning of retirement is a big decision. You want to make sure the car you buy will last for a long, long time. It’s even more important when you’re paying full price.

When you remember sudden, frightening accelerations and bum transmissions (that nasty birthday present aside, the other time a Chrysler-made transmission failed was far from home on the New York Thruway. It cost us $1,600 for repairs plus a night in a motel), your mind tends to wander towards the latest car issue of Consumer Reports.

What manufacturer has the highest quality rating from Consumer Reports?

Honda.

Case closed.

Well, not exactly. Because charity has moved from home to politics.

Now the entity being mistaken for a charitable organization is not just me, but all of us who pay taxes. The new mark is the federal government.

We’re told that the Big Three, singly and together, are too big to fail.

I’ve heard it all before.

Twenty years ago, that was the rationale for bailing out Chrysler. It wasn’t supposed to happen again.

Lots of small businesses were failing back then for the same reasons Chrysler was in trouble — economic hard times mixed with plenty of bad business decisions by the company. Poor quality and an inventory slanted toward gas guzzlers were choices made in Detroit by all three brands.

But Chrysler was propped up, and here they are again, playing the beggar.

I suppose taxpayers will have to bail them out again. How not, when the government has bailed out banks and brokerage firms across the land?

I agree with those who say there should be strict oversight to make sure the money is plowed into improving quality and product lines. Definitely cut bloated wages and benefits for line workers and managers. Why not outright government ownership and management? This has gone beyond socialism or capitalism. We need responsibility.

But I have a simpler non-ideological idea, one that I think might really have a chance at improving quality at all three automakers.

Let’s insist there be no more special discounts for employees of auto companies.

Let’s make sure that when Ford or GM or Chrysler workers appear in a car showroom, the price they pay is no different than what you or I would pay.

No more charity for autoworkers. If they had to buy their vehicles with their hard-earned money, they too might find themselves sneaking a look at Consumer Reports.

If autoworkers no longer received cars as rewards for blind loyalty, but instead had to budget the cost over a period of years just like the rest of us, we might actually see some of those Ford, GM and Chrysler workers buying Toyotas or Hondas, having concluded that’s the choice that gives them the best bang for their buck.

Wouldn’t that be a story?

All of a sudden, quality would REALLY be Job One.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Auto bailout | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Future of JOTR

The Future of JOTR
11/05/08

[donation]

By Joel Thurtell

Longtime readers of joelontheroad.com may have noticed the blog went through a dry spell this past week when for several days no columns were posted.

Well, I HOPE you noticed.

Rumors that we were hit by a strike are unfounded, however.

It is NOT true that the entire staff staged a walkout, led by music critic Pete Pizzicato playing the kazoo.

Nor would it be correct to say that the chief henchman was a henchwoman, food critic Melanie Munch, who did NOT protest my refusal to continue subsidizing cheese blintzes for the entire staff.

I never approved those blintzes in the first place.

Nor is it true that star writer Luke Warm, shop steward for Local 2011119 of the Amalgamated League of Blogbloviators, handed me a list of 99 demands that I promptly fed into the document shredder.

First of all, JOTR doesn’t even OWN a document shredder.

Second, Luke Warm is NOT my star writer. Star confabulator would be a more apt description.

I’m sorry, Luke, but you pushed me into a corner.

The fact is, and this is true, that JOTR is approaching a crossroads. Next month will mark the anniversary of joellontheroad.com.

The blog has turned out very differently from what I envisioned as I packed boxes and got ready to bail out of the Detroit Free Press where my last day after a bit more than 23 years was November 30, 2007.

My plan was to produce a weekly blog-newspaper containing the same kind of first-person feature columns I’d been writing for the Community Free Press.

That notion fell flat before I even started when it suddenly occurred to me that every mile I drive, every hour I spend reporting and writing, is compensated not by a daily newspaper but by yours truly.

My idea of selling ads to cover costs never went anywhere. Who would sell those ads?

Hey, who would BUY them?

So he idea of writing first-person features about other people vanished and in its place, I found myself. Yes, found my SELF. Or at least. I began mining themes and ideas that were mine, rather than those that were either assigned or guided by standard newspaper thinking.

It has been an adventure.

I’m now struggling to install improvements in this site. And I’m trying to bring to life other sites that will allow me to mine more deeply into areas of interest.

In particular, I’ll be looking harder at environmental issues. And looking deeper. In the next few days, I can’t predict exactly when, I’ll launch a series of columns about pollution problems and the Rouge River.

Hang onto your hats.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Me?

Posted in Bloggery, Joel's J School | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

JOTR pollster: 4 of 5 for Obama

JOTR pollster: 4 of 5 for Obama
10/24/08

[donation]

By Joel Thurtell

I checked in with my chief pollster yesterday (Thursay, October 24, 2008) and she told me the results of her latest survey of likely voters in this year’s presidential race.

Actually, the exchange went like this:

As I sat down in her barber’s chair, Dolly Marzka, owner of Ye Olde Barber Shoppe in Plymouth, Michigan, said, “What do you think of the election?”

And I said, “That’s my question for you, Dolly. You’ve got your finger on the pulse.”

It’s true. Even though her business nearly flat-lined right after the stock market crashed a couple weeks ago, Dolly — best barber I’ve ever had — draws clients from all over southeastern Michigan. Her sample is mostly guys — discerning, smart guys who know what I know about Dolly.

Best barber they’ve ever had.

So before I had a chance to obey her command to “scooch up, sit up straight!” I learned that four out of five of Dolly’s customers are voting for Barack Obama.

“Even longtime Republicans are for Obama,” Dolly said.

Dolly was very impressed with Colin Powell’s speech last week endorsing Obama.

She was not impressed by Sarah Palin’s $150,000 wardrobe.

“She’s an insult to women!” Dolly said.

For those who don’t know Dolly, this is a tough woman who’s making it with hard work. Dolly knows what Barack Obama means by “spreading the wealth.” The federal government spread some of its wealth in the 1970s through a government program created by the Comprehensive Employment Education Act. Dolly was a single mom with three young kids living on welfare when CETA paid for her to go to barber school. That training turned her into a business woman — but one who hasn’t forgotten where she came from. Or that government gave her the skills to be independent.

And for those who don’t know Plymouth, this place is not exactly a Democratic bastion. The place is so Republican that their historical society pretends it’s not true that a governor once lived and campaigned here. For a number of years, the late John Swainson lived less than a block from my house (I didn’t live here then) and was elected governor in 1960.

Yet even in Plymouth and Plymouth Township, you see Obama/Biden signs on front yards.

Last weekend, I was amazed to go back to my home town, Lowell, about 15 miles east of Grand Rapids and a traditional GOP, Jerry FOrd-loving stronghold. When I was growing up in Lowell in the 1950s and 1960s, the place was so strongly Republican that only two people — an ex-convict and the town doctor — admitted to being Democrats.

Today, you can drive down Washington Street towards my parents’ house and see three yards — THREE YARDS!! — sprouting Obama signs.

There’s a lot of talk about closet racists saying they’ll vote for Obama but privately planning to go for McCain in the voting booth.

Maybe.

But there aren’t enough of those slimeballs to make a difference.

The message Dolly is hearing is not coming from closet racists. It’s coming from people who are fed up with Republicans. ANY REpublicans. Eight years of lies and corruption from the Bush administration are enough. They wouldn’t be telling her that if they didn’t truly mean it.

I saw a big yellow envelope lying on Dolly’s counter beside the combs and electric razors. Like me, she’s ready to get that ballot in early. Get it counted before the rush.

Except from what I hear, voting early has turned into a crush.

We want the bastards out now!

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in People | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Rouge 2008: Festival of self-congratulation

Rouge 2008: Festival of self-congratulation
10/22/08

[donation]

By Joel Thurtell

Somehow, I can’t get all that excited about a new, $1 billion blast furnace at the Severstal steel mill on the Rouge River in Dearborn. I’m still blinking from the dust and grime that blew into my eyes last month when I drove my boat up the Rouge River to the Severstal plant in Dearborn.

To tell the truth, I can’t get all that excited about Henry Ford’s massive Rouge auto manufacturing plant on the same site. What with generations-long pollution, dredging the river to freighter depth, building steel and concrete sea walls and wharves, the Rouge plant has to be the Number One cause of environmental degradation on the Lower Rouge River.

Nor do I get all carried away with the other Rouge River steel mill — the one owned by U.S. Steel whose three blast furnaces are situated on Zug Island at the mouth of the Rouge.

Maybe it’s ’cause I’m still mad (I am!) at the way a Severstal security guard illegally tried to eject me and my motorboat from the public waters of the freighter bay leading into the huge Ford-Severstal complex.

I thought maybe the stooge didn’t like me taking photos of the rising columns of ore, coke and limestone dust being blown off the open piles of said raw materials lined up alongside the freighter dock. But a friend tells me a Severstal guard ordered him to leave when he came by boat into the Turning Bsin at the Rouge plant.

Guess Severstal and its Russian owners think think they own everything, including the water that floats our boats and the disgusting air they ruin before we can breathe it. That’s nothing new — industries that settled along the Lower Rouge have acted like what’s good for their short-term needs must be great for Michiganders and Ontarians, too.

Now they’re celebrating their near-complete destruction of the Lower Rouge as a habitat for wildlife Friday, October 24 at the University of Michigan-Dearborn. UM-D is hosting this annual festival of self-congratulation at 8 a.m. in UM-D’s Fairlane Center North Building.

By the way, that expression, “festival of self-congratulation,” is not my own creation. I heard it from a friend who used the term to describe Rouge 2006. I was invited along with my colleague, Patricia Beck, to be part of the show at Rouge 2006. We were to show photos and talk about our five-day June 2005 canoe trip 27 miles up the Rouge. We were later dis-invited. I don’t know why. It is correct that some of my comments about the condition of the Rouge were, well, a bit critical.

It’s been a long wait, but for anyone who might have found our show interesting in 2006, our canoe adventure story will be reprised more completely in book form, to be published by Wayne State University Press next April. We call the book Up the Rouge! Paddling Detroit’s Hidden River.

Rouge 2006 and all the other year-Rouges are organized by a group called the Rouge Gateway Partnership, which includes UM-D, Henry Ford Community College, plus many municipalities and industries in the Rouge watershed.

It will be quite an amazing show, if you enjoy oxymorons like “corporate environmentalism.”

A press release from UM-D proclaims, “Annual report on Rouge River to celebrate $7B in investments.”

The subhead says, “Corporate investments along the lower Rouge River have created thousands of jobs and enhanced environmental status of the region.”

It was hard for me to see how the “environmental status of the region” has been enhanced as I looked across the banks of the Rouge from my motorboat one warm day last September.

The biggest pile of table salt I’ve ever seen stood blowin’ in the wind beside the river. It was Morton Salt Co.’s contribution to enhancing the environmental status of the region.

Ditto U.S. Gypsum, enhancing the environmental status with open piles adding grit to the breeze. And ditto a pair of cement companies, and U.S. Steel’s blast furnaces on Zug Island. All adding environmental status.

Try flying over Zug island in an open-door helicopter. I’ve done it, and at 1,000 feet the stench of sulfur is awful.

On the ground, it’s not just the grit, either.

Noise! The roar of those Zug Island blast furnaces has an amazing reach. In our canoe in June 2005, we

could hear that roar for miles as we paddled against headwinds in our little canoe.

Every time I open the door of my car, I think about what it costs to produce a vehicle made primarily of steel.

But that bad air! Last year, while still working as a Detroit Free Press reporter, I wrote about a garden cultivated by kids at the Delray Community Center. I watched kids harvest some nice squash and tomatoes, but nobody wanted to eat them. They were covered with a film of who-knows-what — particles of crud that fell from the sky, having been spewed upward by the steel mills, salt mines, cement plants and the nation’s largest single-site waste water treatment plant whose stacks can be seen from the garden.

Environmental status?

Give me a break.

Okay, I’ll give them this: Thanks to the Clean Water Act and some actual enforcement, industrial pollutants have been reduced. The Rouge no longer catches fire.

But is that the standard we want?

The host of these annual Rouge “reports,” the University of Michigan, doesn’t have clean hands, either. According to the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, one of the two biggest impediments to a viable fishery in the Rouge River is the dam at Fair Lane, the Henry Ford Estate now owned and operated as a tourist draw by UM. The dam diverts water to electric generators installed in 1913 for Henry Ford by his pal Thomas Edison. It’s considered, rightly, a historic artifact.

But the dam blocks the passage of fish that might swim up the Rouge to spawn. The solution is a fish passageway. It’s actually been proposed by the Rouge Gateway folks, but nobody, including UM, is ready to cough up the money — roughly a million bucks — to build one. UM has a huge endowment. Take a walk around the Ann Arbor campus and check out all the new consgtruction. Seems like they could fine a million bucks for a fish ladder, doesn’t it?

Less known is the suspicion, voiced to me by the engineer who placed one of Henry Ford’s old generators into operation at UM-D’s Fair Lane mansion, that the mill’s head race may contain sediments contaminated with toxic chemicals. A few years ago, Wayne County spent $12.5 million cleaning toxic chemicals out of the bottom of Newburgh Lake a few miles up the Middle Rouge, so toxics are not a new thought when it comes to Fair Lane.

The Fair Lane generator runs at a fraction of its capacity because the head race is clogged with silt, engineer David Wheeler told me.

Why not clean it? I asked. Because, he told me, nobody wants to know what’s in that sediment.

Some enhancement.

So what’s to celebrate?

Well, it wouldn’t be the other impediment to fish breeding in the Lower Rouge — the four miles of concrete pavement laid under the Rouge by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in 1972 to prevent flooding. Add all the concrete wharves and steel seawalls that line the Rouge — with four miles of the Corps’ concrete pavement — and you get nine miles of wildlife-hostile environment from Michigan Avenue to Zug island.

So tell me again, what is it we’re celebrating?

Well, according to UM-D, “We are celebrating these great corporate citizens who are leading by example and building a sustainable future for our region.”

Here’s an example of “leading by example”: Those inflated booms just downstream from the I-75 bridge. They’re meant to hold back oil and other industrial crap expelled by the Detroit Waste Water Treatment Plant through the O’Brien Drain. That’s where roughly a quarter million gallons of oil were let loose into the Rouge back in 2002. Last year, I reported in the Free Press that more oil was being dumped into the municipal drains and it was appearing in the Lower Rouge. That was around the time of Rouge 2007.

On Tuesday, October 21, 2008, a federal jury convicted three men of dumping 13 million gallons of industrial waste into Detroit’s sewer system, from whence it was disgorged into the Rouge River via the O’Brien Drain. According to the Wednesday, October 22, 2008 Detroit Free Press, one of the men faces up to 10 years in prison, another up to five years and a third could spend a year in stir.Hey, anybody wanta take a dip?

Before we went on our canoe trip, I checked to see how safe it might be for us if we fell out of our canoe. At best 5 percent of the time the Rouge is safe for swimming. At best. That counts the less-polluted headwaters, so figure this: You never want to fall into the Lower Rouge.

But that’s where they’ll be celebrating.

UM-D’s “sustainable future” may translate to “jobs, jobs, jobs,” but it doesn’t return the vast fish and animal breeding grounds destroyed by the late 19th and early 20th century industrialists who converted the Lower Rouge to a shipping channel and an industrial sewer. Their heirs may boast of sustainable this and that, but if you drive your boat up the Rouge, or paddle a kayak or canoe, you’ll see as I did that nothing much has changed.

Unless you’re ejected by their security guards.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Adventures on the Rouge, Lakes and streams | Tagged | Leave a comment

Matty’s little “in” at Riverside Park

Matty’s little “in” at Riverside park
10/21/08

[donation]

Why is it that one businessman could simply take over parts of a Detroit city park, closing a public boat ramp, and not be met by a SWAT squad of armed city cops telling his hooligans to put the park back the way it was?

Thanks to David Josar and Christine MacDonald of The Detroit News we know trucking tycoon and Ambassador Bridge owner Matty Moroun had a special in with deposed Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick.

The News yesterday (October 20, 2008) reported that no outsider had more contact with the former mayor than Matty, who gave at least $50,000 in political contributions to Kwame.

The two News reporters reviewed 1,886 paves of Kilpatrick’s daily schedules from 2003 to 2007. They reported that “no one got more face time with Kilpatrick than Manuel “Matty” Moroun, the enigmatic trucking magnate and owner of the Ambassador Bridge. They met 11 times in 2006 and 2007, while the Grosse Pointe Shores industrialist’s company was negotiating with the city to buy land for an expanded Cobo Center and for the base of the bridge. Moroun and his family donated more than $50,000 to Kilpatrick.”

Well, well.

Wonder if the twain ever talked about Matty’s favorite Riverside Park? That’s the one adjacent to his bridge on the south side, the park with the public walkway with a beautiful view of the Detroit River and Windsor. The park with the very nice public boat launch crudely chained and padlocked by Matty’s hirelings.

The lock-out is to protect the bridge from terrorists, according to bridge president Dan Stamper.

‘Course, no other international bridge locks people out. Check the international bridge at Sault Ste. Marie, the Blue Water Bridge at Port Huron or hey — get this — check out the Canadian side of Matty’s beloved Ambassador Bridge.

Open to the public!

But of course, Matty no doubt has not met 11 times with the political officials responsible for protecting the other bridges or even the Windsor side of his own bridge. Or — presumably — spread his monetary largesse their way.

Eleven times he met with Kwame in two years. How many times did Matty meet with Kwame in 2001 and 2002, when he supposedly seized the park?

Back to the drawing board, Newsies! We need more information.

Okay, okay. I’ll see what I can do.

Drop me a line at joelontheroad.com

Posted in Me & Matty | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Free Press enemies list

Free Press enemies list
10/20/08

[donation]

By Joel Thurtell

Thanks to Metro Times columnist Jack Lessenberry for tipping his columnist’s hat and sending more readers to joelontheroad.com.

In his September 24, 2008 column, Jack wrote about my column, called “The art of writing bullshit,” in which I posted a Free Press memo to staff outlining various promotions and, well, maybe, demotions. At a meeting called to talk about the job moves, Lessenberry reported, Free Press Editor Paul Anger told staffers the future of the Free Press might well involve dropping reports from the Associated Press and also could involve “killing fewer trees.”

“Killing fewer trees”?

Readers of joelontheroad.com know that I’ve mentioned rumors from inside the paper that the Freep’s paper publication might be reduced to three times a week in tabloid form. Is that what they mean by “killing fewer trees”?

A better term would be “killing a newspaper.” No better way to knock off a newspaper than to leave its vending machines empty four days a week.

Lessenberry mined some gems that didn’t roll my way. Here’s how he wrote about Anger’s little pep talk with staffers: “After Anger explained how they were further diminishing the paper, he asked staffers not to talk about it to outsiders because ‘it doesn’t help, it can give comfort or ideas to the enemy.’ ”

Now I’m wondering, which enemy does Paul Anger mean?

Can’t be the Detroit News. That former arch-rival has been neutralized. It now belongs to Gannett, also owner of the Freep.

Can’t be the Observer & Eccentric chain of suburban papers. Gannett owns them, too. Why, most of the O & E staff are moving right in with the Newsies and Freepsters on West Lafayette.

Nor could it be the suburban Mirror papers. Yes indeed, you guessed it — in Gannett’s pocket.

Well, who’s the enemy?

Hmmm.

The Metro Times?

Oh-oh. Could the MT be next in line on Gannett’s Monopoly board?

That would sure shut Jack Lessenberry up, wouldn’t it?

Hmmm. Who else might be on the Free Press enemies list?

No!

You gotta be kidding.

Where is the gratitude?

Why, who’s repeatedly held out to the flailing News and Free Press a helping hand in their hour of need?

So far, Gannett has not taken me up on my generous offer to merge their declining (so they say) operation with my upward-bound (so I say) blog, joelontheroad.com.

Hey, I don’t harbor a grudge.

My JOA offer still stands, guys. Give it some thought.

Only one thing I ask, besides putting me in charge:

Shred that enemies list!

Drop a line to joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in future of newspapers, Kwamegate | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment