JOTR host change

By Joel Thurtell

Success!

With the help of my sons, Adam and Abe, joelontheroad.com is now hosted by Dearborn-based Acenet.

Acenet’s customer support service has been spectacular, but still, I could not have made this switch without the help and PATIENCE of Adam and Abe.

Thanks, guys. You were wonderful.

We got no cooperation from my former host, who was nonetheless willing to pocket my money. Thus, the change was not seamless.

Some if not all links may have been lost and a number of reader comments are missing. I’m hoping over the next days and weeks that I can replace those important parts of my site.

But now, free of a hosting service that was worse than useless, I plan to add websites with JOTR as a hub.

My apologies if things are not appearing quite as they. Soon, JOTR will be better than ever.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Bloggery | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

JOTR changes

JOTR changes hosts
11/28/08

By Joel Thurtell

Joelontheroad is switching hosts.

That will be a GOOD thing when it’s finished.

Meantime, there may be some interruption in publication of joelontheroad.com.

Don’t worry.

I’ll be back, and the blog will be better for the change.

When the switch is complete, I’ll outline my ideas for this and other blogs.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Bloggery | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

City sues to evict Matty from Riverside Park

City sues to evict Matty from Riverside Park
11/26/08

[donation]

By Joel Thurtell

The city of Detroit Monday filed suit in 36th District Court to evict the Detroit International Bridge Co., aka the Ambassador Bridge, aka Manuel “Matty” Moroun, from the city’s Riverside Park next door to the bridge, a city source said.

Sometime after 9/11 in 2001, Moroun seized parts of the park, claiming he needed them to protect the bridge from potential terrorists.

Moroun’s workers padlocked the public boat launch on the Detroit River, and they fenced off a section of the park at 23rd Street near Fort so Moroun could store construction materials on what once were public basketball courts and a shady, grassy park.

A hearing has been set for sometime in December.

JOTR will publish more details as we find them.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Me & Matty | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Still the daily Free Press?

Still the daily Free Press?
11/29/08

[donation]

By Joel Thurtell

Maybe the Free Press won’t go two days a week print and all-the-time Web, as I suggested in my last column.

That article reproduced an Internet site called freepressoffer.com with the password PM. Go on the site and you’ll see an offer for people to subscribe to the Free Press Sundays and Thursdays with a subscription online to the other five days of the paper.

On the other hand, who knows?

Seemed pretty logical to assume that site signaled that the Freep was planning to reduce its print publication to twice-a-week. After all, there have been rumors about a reduced publication schedule since early last summer.

But maybe not.

Writes star Free Press reporter M.L. Elrick: “Joel, we’ve been told that the new plan does not eliminate daily publication of the paper. Have you considered that this offer is geared to readers who want the papers that come with all the inserts without the other 5 days’ worth of papers?”

No, Mike, that had not occurred to me.

But it seems like a possibility.

On the other hand, we heard managers say they weren’t dumping the Community Free Press, didn’t we? The denial followed a report on JOTR that the CFP was on death row.

And we know what happened months after the denial — anybody seen the CFP lately?

Have to wait and see, I guess.

But I have to admit two things.

First, despite my criticisms of the Free Press, I rely on it to give me regional and state news. It is, despite all the downsizing, the buyouts (of whom I am one) and the rumors of bad things to come, still a pretty doggone good newspaper.

Second, I hate reading newspapers online.

So, I hope Mike Elrick is right.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in future of newspapers | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Future of one newspaper?

Future of one newspaper?
11/25/08

[donation]

By Joel Thurtell

Two days a week print.

Five days Internet.

That would appear to be the latest game plan for the Detroit Free Press to cut operating costs.

This is according to a website supposedly being test marketed with select readers. The site was emailed to me and, I’m told, came from inside the Detroit Media Partnership building where work the geniuses who run the Free Press and Detroit News.

Is this for real?

I don’t know. Have a look for yourself:

freepressoffer.com

Password: PM

Doesn’t say what they plan to do with the News.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in future of newspapers | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Hank Fonde: “I beat Ohio State!”

Hank Fonde: “I beat Ohio State!”
11/19/08

[donation]

By Joel Thurtell

The 80-year-old old guy with the shock of white hair wore a fading maize and blue University of Michigan t-shirt.

But this was not just any Michigan fan. Nor was it just any UM t-shirt.

The younger woman, maybe in her fifties, quite evidently from Ohio, didn’t know either of these things. And neither of us knew something this old man was about to reveal to us, a story I would not piece together for several years, even though I’d known this onetime Michigan football star and coach for more than three decades.

I ought to — I’ve been married to his oldest daughter since 1974.

The conversation — if you can call it that — took place near the dock at J & G Marina on McGregor Bay in Ontario, a few miles by water from an island where this old man and his family had a summer cottage bought in the mid-1960s, when he was a UM football coach, second-in-command under another well-known Michigan player and coach, Bump Elliott.

The Ohio woman spotted the yellow t-shirt with the UM logo and some script she didn’t understand. The shirt was a gift from UM to Hank and those 1948 team-mates still living at the time Michigan won the Rose Bowl game on January 1, 1998. The shirt commemorated two Rose Bowl victories and two National championships 50 years apart. Hank was a member of that New Year’s Day 1948 UM team that blew the University of Southern California away. The score was Michigan 49, USC 0.

The Ohio woman didn’t know this. All she knew was that this old man was wearing a t-shirt belonging to the enemy, the hated University of Michigan. She was an Ohio State fan. An easily perturbed Ohio State fan (aren’t they all?). Had she stopped to learn who this old man was, she might have heard an interesting story. But the ending of that story would have perturbed her even more.

My sons and I watched the Ohio woman, unforgettable because she came on so angry, so full of bile, so hostile to an old man who had said nothing to offend her.

Hank could not respond round for round with this woman’s incessant, nasty volleys. Hank has Alzheimer’s Disease. His memory has long been gone for the people, places, things and events that once were dear to him. I wonder sometimes if all that knock-about football play with the flimsy leather helmets might have contributed to his memory loss.

But I have my memory for who Hank was and I could have told her some phenomenal things about him. Most of it has nothing to do with football. Why, it was Hank who took me fishing in McGregor Bay and put us over the best bass and pike fishing. It was Hank who coached me to filet a bass, pike or any fish with surgical accuracy. It was Hank who helped me with the summer-long project of replacing the porch roof on our first house in Plymouth. I can hear him still: “Measure twice, cut once, measure twice, cut once!”

Hank loved language. Read “Sayings of Hank Fonde” and I think you will agree — he was a poet.

But of course, football was an almost undying love — even with the Alzheimer’s he could correctly call a play.

Football. He was a high school star in his home town of Knoxville, where his team once stood four other teams in succession, playing fresh teams a quarter apiece. Hank played something called “scatback,” and helped Knoxville knock off all four teams.

Then there was the memorable movie somebody put together from that 1948 Rose Bowl game footage. “Seven Touchdowns in January.” On the screen you can see a small but agile halfback — Hank — scooting around Southern Cal players and lofting the football to a Michigan man, who made a touchdown.

For 10 years in the 1950s, Hank was head football coach at Ann Arbor High School, from 1949-58. In his first eight years, his team lost one game. His overall record was 69 wins, six losses and four ties. Four of the losses occurred his last year, when he and his players knew he was leaving to coach at UM. From 1959-68, Hank coached at UM under Bump Elliott where the win-loss record was nothing to brag about, though this year it was surpassed, if that is the word. But still, Hank coached a Michigan team that won the Jan. 1, 1965 Rose Bowl game against Oregon State, 34-7.

Turns out there was more to learn about Hank and Michigan football, things I didn’t know.

But here was this Ohio woman coming on with her nasty, Michigan-bashing comments, taunting an old man who under normal circumstances can’t remember the beginning of a sentence he’s trying so hard, with such frustration, to conclude.

Yet the Ohio woman wore on, making her crude remarks, getting no response from the old man in the maize and blue t-shirt.

Despite the Alzheimer’s, somehow Hank understood the gist of what the Ohio woman was saying.

As she paused for breath, Hank at last found words.

Amazingly, he put together a sentence rooted in a core memory, a recollection that even the brutal Alzheimer’s could not erase.

“I beat Ohio State!”

It was amazing to hear him utter a complete sentence, and to do it with such sternness, such authority.

The Ohio woman looked at Hank as if she finally understood that this old man was demented.

I have to admit, his comment puzzled me.

The Ohio woman went silent.

I thought about it: “I beat Ohio State!”

What could Hank have meant?

The Ohio woman drifted away, maybe looking for someone elderly with a green Michigan State shirt to haze.

Several years later, I was visiting Hank’s son, my brother-in-law, Mark Fonde. Mark has one of the footballs Hank was given after games when he made crucial plays.

This particular football, faded, worn and deflated, had painted on it, “Michigan 7, Ohio 3.”

What was the significance of that? I asked Mark.

Mark told me the story. It was 1945, the last game of the season, and Michigan was usual facing arch-rival Ohio State.

Ohio scored a field goal for 3 points early in the game. The score stayed 0-3 until the last quarter.

In that fourth quarter, Hank took the ball and barreled into the end zone. He was clobbered by Ohio State tacklers and knocked back onto the playing field. He was literally knocked out, too, only regaining consciousness in the locker room when somebody handed him a football.

He’d made the winning touchdown for Michigan. The game had ended, 7-3.

Last summer, I mentioned this to my older son, Adam. He reminded me of what granddad said to the Ohio woman.

Finally, I understand what Hank meant.

If she could only know: How many people can say with absolute accuracy what Hank told that Ohio woman?

“I beat Ohio State!”

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Hank Fonde | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Cards on the table

Cards on the table
11/17/08

[donation]

By Joel Thurtell

Reading last weekend’s Detroit Free Press, with a veritable phalanx of columnists weighing in for a bailout of Detroit’s car-makers, was a pretty daunting experience for me.

I’ve taken the opposite view, arguing for the harsh discipline of bankruptcy rather than the taxpayer-risk-prone solution favored the Freep.

Man oh man, the Freep was really on a roll.

Time has come for a little confession: I have a dog in this circus. It’s axiomatic that each of us is motivated by self-interest, so here is mine: I am purely a consumer when it comes to cars. I don’t work for the auto-makers or their union. I don’t work for their suppliers.

It seems fair for me to claim that last spring, when my wife and I deliberated which kind of car to buy, the auto-makers had no direct influence on our choice.

Nor do they have a direct sway over what I write about their pleas for a financial rescue.

I believe we made our decision as independently as we could.

Now I feel like I’m one of the pundits against whom Free Press writers have inveighed as they defend the Big Three against critics — myself included — who fault the American car industry for relying on gas-guzzlers and for producing cars that can’t compare with foreign brands for design, reliability and quality of construction.

Despite a Detroit Free Press article today, November 17, 2008, deriding “halftruths and misrepresentations that are endlessly repeated by everyone from members of Congress to journalists,” I believe my opinions on this subject are far less motivated by self-interest than those of the Freepsters.

The Free Press article claimed to dispel six myths about Detroit’s Big Three, including this one: “MYTH NO.2 They build unreliable junk”

Sorry, Free Press, that is a phony way to argue. MYTH NO. 2 is a straw man, easy to rebut, but not a true representation of the opposing argument.

At our house, we did not make our car-buying decision based on the belief that Detroit cars are “unreliable junk.” However, had we done so, I think we might be pardoned for acting on a prejudice based on two transmission failures with a Chrysler product (one at 12,000 miles) and a dangerous series of uncontrolled accelerations with a Ford Windstar.

But Consumer Reports didn’t have our input.

After studying the car issue of Consumer Reports earlier this year, we decided to buy our new vehicle from the manufacturer that got the top grades from CR for design, quality and reliability. That company happened to be Honda. The car we bought was a CR-V. We bought the CR-V even though Toyota’s similar RAV-4 was rated above the CR-V. Why? Because there’s a Honda dealership less than a mile from our house, while Toyota is a 40-minute round trip from our home. And because Honda overall was rated by CR tops, while Toyota overall was second. What company was in third place? Not an American — Subaru.

Consumer Reports didn’t say the Big Three make “unreliable junk,” and that was not the information we relied upon.

What I could not help but notice in the CR ranking was that there were two tiers of auto manufacturers, with Honda at the top left side of the chart, foillowed by Toyota and Subaru. Ford, General Motors and Chrysler were in the second, or bottom, tier, starting in the middle and with Chrysler dead last for overall quality.

Now, I’m sure it’s true that the Big Three have made enormous improvements since the mid and late 1990s when we bought those cars that caused us so much inconvenience, money and fright.

But they are still in the bottom tier for quality, according to Consumer Reports.

As a retiree, I’m buying a car that I will need to keep for years and years. I’m betting my money on quality. Top quality.

That is my self-interest.

There, my cards are on the table.

Will the Free Press lay its cards out for us to see?

When I read a bevy of Free Press writers all coming down on the same side of an issue, it puts me in mind of the paper’s rush to push Kwame Kilpatrick out of office. Never a dissenting voice at the Freep.

I discerned the paper’s self-interest then as part gloating and part a mania for winning as many journalism awards as possible, including the coveted Pulitzer Prize.

What might be the paper’s self-interest in promoting a bailout for the Big Three?

You won’t read a disclaimer in their news and opinion columns.

Let me place their cards on the table.

Please see Section D of today’s Detroit Free Press, and advertisements paid for by, among others, Shelton Pontiac-Buick-GMC, Liberty Chevrolet, Suburban Chrysler Jeep Dodge, Marty Feldman Chevrolet, Bill Snethkamp Chrysler Jeep Dodge and Al Deeby Dodge.

Whom did the dealers pay?

Why, the advertising department of the Detroit Free Press.

What would happen to those ads if one or more of the Detroit auto-makers went out of business?

Gone like the dodo.

The Free Press cut nearly 40 editorial staffers in the past 12 months through buyouts. Overall, more than 110 employees left the Detroit Free Press and Detroit News in last summer’s round of buyouts. My old paper, the South Bend Tribune, just cut 14 percent of its staff.

Newspapers are in deep weeds. Either through mismanagement, hard times or the onslaught of the Internet, newspapers are not far behind the car-makers in their descent towards Chapter 11.

If banks can get bailouts, so one Free Press pundit argued, why not the Big Three?

And hey, if the Big Three get a bailout, why not the newspaper industry?

They won an exemption from anti-trust laws from Congress back in 1970. Why not a bailout tomorrow?

Don’t be surprised to hear the news media howling for a handout one of these days.

Oh yes, newspapers have a big bruiser of a dog in this circus.

None is barking as loudly as the Free Press.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Auto bailout, censorship, future of newspapers, Joel's J School | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Pigging out in Detroit

Pigging out in Detroit
11/14/08

[donation]

By Joel Thurtell

What was put in place at that time was very appropriate.

— Nancy Rae, executive vice president for human resources and communications, Chrysler LLC

Very appropriate indeed.

If your name is Nancy Rae.

What an amazing performance Rae gave for a Detroit Free Press reporter inquiring about so-called “executive retention bonuses” at Chrysler, LLC, one of the Big Three auto-making companies now pleading poor to Congress and begging for a taxpayer-paid bailout of their debt-ridden and virtually sales-proof operations.

Rae, the official defender of Chrysler largess to top execs, herself picked up a tidy 1.66 million smackers, thanks to the bonus plan she described to the Free Press as “very conservatively constructed.”

Man oh man.

I’d sure like one of those “conservatively constructed” bonuses.

What have I done to pull the automakers out of their present crisis? In other words, what have I done to DESERVE such a generous, such a magnanimous, no, such a cock-eyed, ridiculous and self-serving piece of corporate chicanery?

About as much as any of the half dozen bigwigs who gleaned a total of more than $10 million.

The argument for giving these handouts to the top half dozen was supposedly made by DaimlerChrysler in 2007 when it was readying its American car-maker for sale. The German company wanted to make sure there was a plan for keeping key managers in place during a change of ownership. But now that the hotshots are collecting their ill-gotten gains, the system is looking a bit stupid and poorly-timed.

The truth always hurts, no matter the timing.

If there is a government bailout of the Big Three, I’d like to see performance evaluations on these honchos. What did they do to earn that $10 million?

Now, these were only the six largest bonuses. The Free Press mentions that there were others that ranged down to a paltry 200,000 grand.

Imagine getting stuck with “only” 200 k.

We don’t know the total amount of all these bonuses.

It’s not just a matter of stopping these outrageous payouts.

Here’s my slogan: Stop the checks, sack execs!

Under a federal bailout, all of these yokels need to be swept out.

But the better alternative would be to let things shake out in another kind of bailout — federal bankruptcy court.

I can’t imagine how any contribution these people made could justify sapping money from the $30 billion Chrysler now claims it needs to stay afloat.

The assumption underlying the entire discussion about the bailout is based on concerns 1) that a failure of one or more of the Big Three would devastate huge swaths of American society, taking down auto part suppliers, banks that have made loans to them, bars and restaurants that rely on workers spending money and foremost workers themselves, who would be left without jobs and a source of income and 2) the belief among many Americans that this country needs to have a homegrown car industry as an element of national security.

I have no doubt that Number One is true, and that a single failure would be devastating.

I’m not so sure about Number Two. Is it national security, or national pride?

If it’s pride, how much are we willing to pay for it?

But let’s accept as a given that our nation needs an auto industry as part, at least, of our national identity. The question then is WHICH auto industry do we need? The one we have, which is moribund and fully capable at any time of driving itself into the ground and then screaming for help because the nation so desperately needs it to uphold some chauvinistic sense of who we are?

Or should we invest our money in a NEW car industry, one dedicated to designing and making efficient, inexpensive cars people actually want to purchase with money they earned, as opposed to cars that are sold to, say, rental agencies and then re-sold back to the manufacturers to keep alive fictitious counts of sales? Or cars that are leased at absurdly low prices to employees to stoke the myth of ever-popular Ford, GMs and Chrysler products.

What if we put our national treasure into a brand new automotive industry predicated on serving national needs?

Hey, maybe part of that new automotive industry would be reviving the same public transportation systems the car-makers tore about decades ago so as to create a false need and hence demand for the autos hey were selling us to us to uphold their outrageous salaries and bonuses.

Time to step back and look broadly at our transportation needs.

What is the role of the automobile in the bigger context of transportation locally, regionally, nationally and internationally?

Why do we Americans believe we need cars in the first place? Isn’t it because of the billions the Big Three have spent over generations creating the psychological need for these gleaming machines at the same time that they re-jiggered the country’s transportation structure to make it absolutely essential that we own a car or truck in order to keep a job?

Why should we want to retain that vision?

The whole damned aim of Detroit was self-serving.

Let’s scrap it.

Time for the nation to serve itself.

Let’s pump our money into a rejuvenated mass transportation system. If the Ford, General Motors and Chrysler can help, sans those high-paid drones and fully re-structured into efficient, nation-serving organizations, great.

If not, let’s kiss the Big Three goodbye.

In the long run, we’d gain more that we lose from the demise of Detroit.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Auto bailout | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How many reporters?

How many reporters?
11/13/08

[donation]

By Joel Thurtell

By now, the drumbeat is almost deafening.

On page A1 today, November 13, 2008, the New York Times newsroom dropped its oar into the maelstrom that is the financial status of what remains of American car-making by publishing an article about how Chapter 11 bankruptcy might not be so bad for General Motors.

The Times newsies had already been scooped by their own columnist, Tom Friedman, who yesterday, November 12, 2008, opined that receivership might be the best thing for taxpayers and for the longevity of the U.S.-based automakers.

Friedman gave credit where it was almost due, to Paul Ingrassia of the Wall Street Journal, who hammered on the same theme in Monday’s, November 10, 2008, WSJ.

But just as the Times’ Micheline Maynard was five days late today with her A1 story about GM and the B-word, so Paul Ingrassia himself was two days in arrears, having been beaten by an obscure blog that is banged out in an undisclosed cave location somewhere west of Detroit.

By which I mean, of course, this very blog, joelontheroad.com, aka JOTR.

It’s embarrassing, really, to have to trumpet my own prescience for the second day in a row.

But it’s necessary.

If I don’t do it, who else will notice that this little website scooped the Giants of Journalism?

What’s the big deal, you say?

Well, think about it: The Giants of Journalism have, even in these lean times, legions of reporters and ancillary staff people to help grind out their news.

At JOTR we have a legion all right — one reporter, one writer, one photographer, one editor, one copy editor, one mail sorter, one file-keeper, one librarian, one guy to answer emails, one guy to dodge longwinded phone calls and one — count him, one — bill-payer.

Me, the JT in JOTR.

Yet somehow JOTR has managed to break stories ahead of the Giants.

And while the GM/car maker stuff is national, let’s look at the local scene.

Matty Moroun, owner of the Ambassador Bridge, and his illegal takeover of a city park and boat launch.

Who broke that story?

JOTR.

Thanks to the Metro Times for reporting it, and to Channel 4.

And thanks to the city and Mayor Ken Cockrel for trying to take back a public park.

But where were the Detroit dailies? They’re the Giants of Journalism in Detroit.

I hear all sorts of groaning from West Lafayette, home of the merged Detroit Free Press and Detroit News, about how the recent buyouts have the remaining reporters working to the bone.

What, have the forces of recession turned those papers into Pygmies of Journalism?

I hear about how Matty Moroun is “an octopus” and it would take a staff of investigative reporters months to unravel meaning from his various business doings.

Come off it, you Pygmies.

You were brave enough to go after Kwame Kilpatrick.

Now that he’s cooling his heels in jail, it’s time to do your duty — tackle the really HARD story. The story that supposedly needs Giants to put it together.

I don’t think so.

I’d like to ask a simple question of those tech-savvy, oh so web-oriented Detroit dailies: How many reporters does it take to screw in a light bulb?

Find the story, folks.

One piece at a time.

Print the story, folks.

One piece at a time.

Free advice from a guy who’s making zilch from blogging and who ain’t no Giant of Journalism.

Now come back from lunch, you bold, Kwame-bashing reporters, and write something about a Giant of Business named Matty Moroun.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Joel's J School | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Next chapter for automakers: Number 11

Next chapter for automakers: Number 11
11/12/08

[donation]

By Joel Thurtell

Longtime readers of JOTR won’t need me to remind them how offended I was by all the triumphant high-fiving and self-backslapping the Detroit Free Press did when Detroit’s former mayor and current jailbird, Kwame Kilpatrick, finally fell off his high and mighty perch.

Well, forgive me, but I’d like to do a bit of self-high-fiving right now. I was reading Tom Friedman’s New York Times column today, November 12, 2008, and I kept having these feelings of deja vu.

As in deja read that.

No, actually, as in deja WROTE that.

“How to Fix a Flat,” was Friedman’s topic, and the flat tire, metaphorically, is Detroit’s Big Three automaking companies — Ford, General Motors and Chrysler.

My first inkling of an echo came as I read Friedman’s line, “How could these companies be so bad for so long?”

Okay, I’ve written about this, but so have others. One of the best books on how self-congratulatingly terrible the Big Three are, in my opinion, is David Halberstam’s “The Reckoning, A tale of two cultures as seen through two car companies,” published in 1987 and amazingly prescient as a warning of the cliff towards which the automakers — and our whole American society and beyond whose well-being depends on it — were driving. Halberstam examined Ford and Nissan, but in so doing, he turned a microscope on the Big Three compared to the Japanese auto industry.

The second really good car book is Micheline Maynard’s “The End of Detroit: How the Big Three Lost Their Grip on the American Car Market.” Maynard’s book came out in 2003, so it’s almost current with today’s issues, and like Halberstam’s tome, “The End of Detroit” describes an American auto-making culture so ensnared in waste, arrogance and rampant stupidity that a crash seems inevitable. Both books make it clear that no matter how much cash is thrown at these companies, they have so lost track of their primary purpose — designing and building top-quality vehicles Americans, rather than rental companies, want to buy — that they will still ultimately be rendered irrelevant, meaningless and hopeless losers by the foreign car makers whose managers and unions do get it.

So where’s the deja vu?

It seems, according to Friedman, that the Wall Street Journal on Monday, November 10, 2008, published a column by its former Detroit bureau chief, Paul Ingrassia.

This is where bells started ringing for me.

According to Friedman, Ingrassia wrote in the NOVEMBER 10 Wall Street Journal, that “in return for any direct government aid, the board and the management [of GM] should go. Shareholders should lose their paltry remaining equity. And a government-appointed receiver (my italics) — someone hard-nosed and nonpolitical — should have broad power to revamp GM with a viable business plan and return it to a private operation as soon as possible. That will mean tearing up existing contracts with unions, dealers and suppliers, closing some operations and selling others and downsizing the company…Giving GM a blank check — which the company and the United Auto Workers union badly want, and which, Washington will be tempted to grant — would be an enormous mistake.”

Powerful thoughts, powerful words. Yet they came a tad late. Two days late.

Had you been reading JOTR, this is what you would have read the morning of Saturday, NOVEMBER 8, fully two days before the WSJ weighed in:

Now we’re hearing that they are not only too big to fail, but GM CEO Rick Wagoner claims even filing for bankruptcy would be devastating — who would buy a car from a bankrupt automaker?

Good point. Something Wagoner might have thought about long ago, when GM was churning out high-profit, gas-guzzling Suburbans and Hummers instead of catching a hint from Honda down there in Marysville, Ohio with its fuel-efficient Civics and Accords. Somehow, Honda, Toyota, Subaru and a flock of other foreign-owned automakers are still afloat and not begging for handouts.

Anything to be learned there, Rick?

Nah. Nothing to be learned when you reward continued failure with merit raises and bonuses.

Here’s why I think a Chapter 11 bankruptcy could be a good thing for Detroit and Dearborn.

There would be no infusion of free money that current managers could throw away on more bonuses for buddies.

Instead, the top guys at Ford, GM and Chrysler would be out. A federal judge would appoint a creditors’ committee to oversee rebuilding the business. A judge might appoint a monitor who could act as a receiver, with power to make and break contracts including agreements with suppliers and, yes, gasp, unions.

In that column, I followed with a discussion of the good things a court-appointed receiver achieved in the 1980s for the bankrupt city of Ecorse, Michigan.

Paul Ingrassia is right. Tom Friedman is right. And so is JOTR:

If we donate billions of dollars to Detroit’s clunker car makers, they’ll blow it like a drunk turned loose in a casino.

And then, because their stupidity is matched only by their audacity, they’ll be back wanting more.

Don’t believe me?

History is my proof. It’s named Chrysler.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Auto bailout | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment