The greatest profession

By Joel Thurtell

What if you’re an elite newspaper and your lunch is being eaten by the very supermarket tabloids that normally bring a sneer of loathing to your collective editorial face?

The very kinds of sources that sell damaging information about celebrities are not coming to you, because you don’t pay for news.

You take the high road.

You are a bastion of elite journalism.

But nonetheless, your ass is being beaten by those sleazy publications that you only peek at while waiting in the checkout line.

What do you do?

Well, you don’t soil your keyboard by actually digging into the tabloid story.

Oh, by the way, I’m thinking of the Tiger Woods “scandal,” in case anybody couldn’t guess.

As I say, you as an elite newspaper take the high road. Rather than doing real dirty work by reporting on numerous women who have boasted that Tiger is a notch on their ill-fitting chastity belts, you stand back and report on the fallout for poor Tiger.

Certainly, Tiger can’t say he wasn’t warned by the respectable journalistic likes of you.

You told Tiger in no uncertain terms what would happen if he didn’t do what you ordered him to do, which was make himself a target early on in a press conference in which lots of self-righteous journalists of the check-book and non-checkbook stamp could take high, middle and low shots at the champ and generally humiliate him at their hearts’ content.

The Tiger was sage enough to avoid your trap, so you taught him what happens to people who don’t play ball with the media.

By rejecting the rules you tried to force on him, he put you media types in the position of having to run anything they could get on the case, as Richard Wright so aptly depicted the reporter mentality in his novel, Native Son.

What could you do?

Morally, you are clean.

Individually, you might have refused to wield your psychological bludgeons, but what choice did you have? If the lowbrow press is covering the story, you have no choice. If you try to sidestep it, self-styled armchair press critics will send bitter epistles to the Times public editor, chastizing the newspaper for depriving its readers of choice material they are forced to read in the gutter press. And the Public Editor will then elicit forced confessions from various editors and writers, humiliating them in print. nobody would want that, so better unleash the hounds and tear into Tiger.

So what if you appear to be kowtowing to the guttersnipe journalists while having your cake and eating Tiger Woods too?

So what if the man committed no crime, despite media efforts in the beginning to insinuate he did something nefarious by bumping his car into a fire hydrant at some ungodly hour of the day when respectable journalists are hunkered down with their own paramours?

So what if he’s been hung out to dry by the leeching advertising syndicate that exploited him and his sport for years. You’re not responsible for causing people to misbehave, are you?

You’re just there to report the news, come what may.

What a wonderful “profession” you have. Really, the greatest profession:

Journalism.

Posted in Joel's J School | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Gift idea: ‘Seydou’s Christmas Tree’

In his book, Seydou’s Christmas Tree, journalist, novelist and JOTR writer Joel Thurtell recalls how he and his wife learned the meaning of Christmas as Peace Corps volunteers living on the parched savanna of Togo, West Africa.

Thanks to a young Muslim friend.

 

The boy’s dad was the imam, who led prayers.

 

His mom protected and advised the Americans.

 

Their son, Seydou, was flunking out of the rigid, French-style Togolese elementary school, but in all matters that fell outside the classroom, Seydou was an expert.

 

Seydou shows us that whether we are Muslim or Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, animist or atheist, our similarities outweigh our differences, and we are all connected.

 

The book was published by Hardalee Press of Plymouth, Michigan. The price is $16 plus shipping. It may be purchased through amazon.com.

 

Hardalee Press also published Thurtell’s memoir of restoring a wooden sailboat, Plug Nickel, And Hardalee produced the 4-CD audio book of Up the Rouge!

 

The audio book of Up the Rouge! is $34.95 plus tax and shipping.

 

Plug Nickel is available on amazon.com for $16 plus shipping.

 

 

Posted in Hardalee Press | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

UTR named Michigan Notable Book

Up the Rouge! Paddling Detroit’s Hidden River by Joel Thurtell and Patricia Beck has won a Michigan Notable Book Award for 2010.

A panel of judges picked 20 books about Michigan topics and Up the Rouge!, published by Wayne State University Press, is on the list.

Posted in Adventures on the Rouge | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Saving newspapers: A modest proposal

By Joel Thurtell

[paypal-donation]

I could make a fortune with this idea, except I got it from The New York Times.

I’d have to kick something back to them, probably.

For once, it might be worth it.

It’s amazingly simple, really.

If it catches on, it’s bound to reverse the downward spiral of American daily newspapers.

Here’s how it would work: You know how the traditional business model for newspapers goes — the papers employ writers to produce the material that helps sell the newspapers.

The key word is “employ,” in the sense that the newspapers, according to tradition, pay the writers for their work.

The genius of my idea, admittedly cribbed from the Times, is that it turns the tables on this age-old system.

Instead of newspapers paying the writers, in my system, the writers will pay the newspapers for the privilege of pounding a beat and writing copy on deadline that attracts people to read the paper.

(Don’t tell the union folks.)

Why has this not occurrred to anyone before?

It will definitely save the newspapers, because they can raise huge amounts of money by charging writers — and for that matter, editors, photographers, designers and all those other people who labor to put out newspapers — to do the work.

Instead of paying the workers, bill them!

How’d I get this idea?

Why, I learned it from the Times when they tried to charge me for writing a story their newspaper printed 30 years ago.

I want to reprint my story as it appeared in the Times, and for that, the Times wants to charge me a fee.

Brilliant!

The Times paid me $75 for writing my story in 1979. That amount  would be worth $211.61 in 2007.

Take all those writers’ salaries and calculate the inflation-corrected dollar amount, then back-charge them. The could soon make up its horrendous losses by mining dollars from its employees.

Don’t tell me it’s absurd! I got it from the Times.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell@gmail.com

Posted in From My Files, future of newspapers, Joel's J School | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Cronies of the Rouge

By Joel Thurtell

I was tromping alongside the Rouge River in Detroit last spring with Sally Petrella, public outreach coordinator for the nonprofit Friends of the Rouge. We were looking for junk cars that people have dumped in the river. In October 2005, the Detroit Free Press ran a series by Freep photographer Patricia Beck and me about our 27-mile canoe trip up the Rouge. Our stories and photos showed junk cars among the trash that has been dumped in the Rouge.

Since then, FOTR has tried to remove them. Every spring since 2006, Sally and I have made this jaunt as I consulted my canoe trip log and located cars to be removed. It appears that as of  last June, Friends of the Rouge will have yanked 21.5 cars from the river or from the floodplain nearby.

I think it’s great that most of the derelict cars are gone. But it doesn’t change the basic fact that in 1985, government environmental officials promised to make the Rouge “swimmable and fishable” by 2005, and that in 2005,  E. coli data showed the river is swimmable at best 5 percent of the time. I’ve made that point several times, both in Free Press articles and in the book Pat Beck and I co-authored for Wayne State University Press: Up the Rouge! Paddling Detroit’s Hidden River.

Swimmable 5 percent of the time, at best? That is not good enough, and yanking junk cars won’t make it better. That abysmal statistic did not stop one Rouge official, James Ridgeway, from declaring a year ago that the mission was accomplished and the Rouge is–in his estimation–“swimmable and fishable.”

Anyway, as Sally and I walked along, chatting about birds and cars, our conversation switched to “Measuring the Rouge”, the title of an article I wrote for the December 10, 2008 Metro Times.

In the months since that article was published, I gathered that some environmental authorities were not happy with my findings. One of my main points: Ostensibly because of money shortages, the people who make decisions about how our environment will be protected have seriously reduced measurement of the vital signs of the Rouge River. Readings for levels of dissolved oxygen that were funded by Wayne County and physically made by hydrologists from the U.S. Geological Survey ended last November. USGS hydrological technician Robert Howell told me the decision was made by ECT, a contractor for Wayne County and also the contractor that administers the Alliance of Rouge Communities, a consortium of Wayne County and local communities whose aim is to expedite approval of storm water discharge permits.

I reported the end of DO measurements in my Metro Times article. I also reported how the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality dramatically reduced measuring for E. coli, an indicator of toilet waste in the river, at the end of 2005.

Sally bristled when I mentioned the end to measuring. She countered that the Rouge is “the most-measured river in the country. There are a billion points of measurement from the Rouge,” she told me. After a certain point, she said, it became clear that things were not changing, so why keep doing the measurements?

First of all, that is quite an admission of failure, to say things aren’t changing so why bother with science.

Secondly, the lack of data goes deeper than simply killing the studies. Would you like to see data collected by Friends of the Rouge?  Would you like to do your own study of FOTR studies? Forget it. They’re a nonprofit, and claim exemption from Michigan sunshine laws. Friends of the Rouge recently denied my Michigan Freedom of Information Act request on grounds that they’re a private institution and not subject to disclosure. They’ll study the Rouge, but don’t you dare try to study them.

But back to measurements: Here’s why we should keep on monitoring: If this river and others are to be cleaned of toilet and industrial waste, we need continuous measurement of pollutants. We need science, not guess work. We need precision, not rule-of-thumb. We need honest, straightforward, journeyman investigations, not hype and propaganda founded on wishful thinking.

Or–maybe–attempts to justify hefty contracts with private firms like ECT that failed in the mission of making the Rouge fit for recreation.

Why do we need to monitor dissolved oxygen? Because fish and other aquatic animals need oxygen to live. Take oxygen away, even for a few hours, and life vanishes in the river.

I can think of only one reason for stopping those DO measurements: Somebody doesn’t want more bad news.

Oh, I know, the authorities will tell you dissolved oxygen is the big success story of the Rouge.  That’s what they say. If that’s so, why quit collecting data? Data are evidence.

Why stomp out the basis for knowledge about the health of the Rouge?

I was told it’s expensive. But I don’t buy the argument that it costs too much.

Here’s how much the USGS charged Wayne County and ARC for DO studies between 2001-2008:

2001, $121,000

2002, $130,170

2003, $135,120

2004, $131,480

2005, $136,840

2006, $45,976

2007, $29,850

2008, $118,700

I received this information from Steve Blumer of USGS.

Note, please, that governments had — by Wayne County’s estimate — spent $1.6 billion as of summer 2008 on fixing the Rouge.

A billion six!

That’s a lot of moolah.

A total of $729,136 has been spend over eight years on measuring dissolved oxygen in the Rouge. That’s an average of $91,142 a year.

The claim that there’s no money is just plain bull.

No money for DO, but ARC budgeted $40,000-plus early this year to pay Friends of the Rouge for its annual frog/toad/bug hunt. And ARC earmarked another roughly $20,000 for the engineering firm Camp, Dresser, McKee to help FOTR with the study. Sixty grand.

According to University of Michigan-Dearborn geology Prof. Kent Murray, the bug hunt is a non-scientific study conducted by volunteers and intended to measure, impressionistically, how well the river supports life.

How is it that Wayne County, which provides 50 percent of ARC’s funding and a co-chair, can support a bug hunt but won’t fund continued disssolved oxygen measurements?

ARC’s budget for 2009 was roughly $900,000, about the same as last year. Funny how it can make room for Friends of the Rouge, but not for the USGS dissolved oxygen study.

If USGS had an employee on FOTR’s board, it might make a difference. For years, Friends of the Rouge has had as a board member and sometimes chair an employee of the main Rouge contractor, ECT. That person has been either ECT vice president and now ARC director Jim Ridgeway or ECT employee Zachare Ball. Ridgeway is the man who stood before a group at the University of Michigan-Dearborn in October 2008 and declared the Rouge to be “swimmable and fishable.”

That’s right, the same people running ARC have their hands in management at Friends of the Rouge.

The picture is coming together. The data are not showing improvements in the river’s health. Therefore, spike the data.

ARC, which is run by ECT, hands money to Friends of the Rouge, influenced by ECT. An official of Friends of the Rouge then goes for a walk with the only public critic of the official unmeasuring scheme and tries to spin him a line about how killing data collection makes sense.

I’m not buying their line.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell(at)gmail.com

Posted in Adventures on the Rouge, Bad government | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

A newspaper vanishes

By Joel Thurtell

[paypal-donation]

I never saw a copy of the short-lived Detroit Daily Pres

I gather it was distributed in some parts of the Detroit area.

Maybe because I was in Canada most of last summer, I was slow to learn about the proposed new daily print newspaper for Detroit.

I think, though, that publicity about the Daily Press was muted. Check out the Detroit Free Press report on the new paper’s demise. “Terse” does not begin to describe the Freep’s approach. Curious, when you recall all the breast-thumping Freepsters did when they were rolling the Kwame bandwagon. This report was based solely on the Daily Press Facebook notice that it was closing — no quotes from anyone connected with the fledgling paper, which for a story about any non-rival business would have been de rigeur. The Detroit News’s story had a bit more text, but no original reporting beyond the Facebook information. The newshounds were dozing on this one.

Oh well, clearly an upstart rival isn’t a subject the established but no longer daily Detroit News and Detroit Free Press would want to publicize.

I read a short item in Editor & Publisher, and I heard about it from friends — former News and Free Press employees — who were approached to help put the new paper out.

Asked what I thought, I could only say that I liked the idea of a daily, though it seemed early for a new one in and around Detroit.

Too early, because while no longer dailies, the Free Press and News are still alive. Like a rattlesnake with a broken back, the Detroit papers still have venom. Their long-established presence casts a shadow over efforts by a newcomer to get readers, advertisers and — most important — credibility.

Then too, the economy is in terrible shape. The established papers are in deep weeds because businesses aren’t buying ads. Why would someone who can’t afford ads in the old-line papers suddenly be inspired to invest in ads in a brand-new and unproven medium?

Better wait for the News and Free Press to roll over dead, was my thought. Wait for a true newspaper vacuum.

But, as I say, my thinking was based on little information about the paper’s financial backing, its internal organization, its journalistic goals.

Nevertheless, I was looking for the Daily Press on November 23, the first day it was supposed to publish. I’d asked someone connected with the new paper how I could subscribe. I got no answer.

That Monday, November 23, 2009, I didn’t see the Daily Press in gas stations or drugstores where I normally see newspapers for sale.

Then, the day after Thanksgiving, while sitting in my mom’s house outside Lowell, I read a short item in the Grand Rapids Press noting that the new paper was dead.

Here’s the Detroit Daily Press comment about its own fate:

Due to circimstances beyond our control, lack of advertising, lateness of our press runs and lack of distribution and sales, we find it necessary to temporarily suspend publication of the Detroit Daily Press until after the 1st of the year. Once we can fix these things, we plan to be back stronger and more organized wh…en we return. This is just a bump in the road and not the end of the Detroit Daily Press.
Read more: http://detroit.blogs.time.com/2009/11/27/detroit-daily-press-suspended/?artId=1868?contType=blog_the_detroit_blog?chn=us#ixzz0YS5MfWTv

Due to circumstances beyond our control, lack of advertising, lateness of our press runs and lack of distribution and sales, we find it necessary to temporarily suspend publication of the Detroit Daily Press until after the 1st of the year. Once we can fix these things, we plan to be back stronger and more organized when we return. This is just a bump in the road and not the end of the Detroit Daily Press.

What does this mean?

I’ll try to decode.

“Circumstances beyond our control”

Means — maybe — there wasn’t enough money for advance work. A new paper needs to be heavily advertised and promoted so people don’t have to e-mail its staffers to find out how to subscribe.

“Lack of advertising”

Means there was very little if any provision for selling ads, which normally requires feet on the street. Again, I’d guess that lack of money meant few ad sales reps roaming the affluent suburbs pounding on doors of businesses that might pay for an ad.

“Lateness of our press runs”

Could mean many things. Were journalists missing deadlines? Were presses breaking down? There was a suggestion in a Detroit blog that printers wanted money up front. Well, I guess if I were a printer working for an unknown newspaper, I’d want to be paid in advance, too. But it again boils down to lack of money.

The same blog implied that the established papers were making trouble. I don’t know, but would not be surprised. What would you expect? Gannett owns the newspaper industry in Detroit and environs and is not known for playing soft ball. Best have a strategy for keeping them at bay, or suffer the consequences.

“Distribution and sales”

If you’re going to sell a newspaper, you’d better know how to deliver it.  First, though, you need to find customers willing to buy it. If you  neglect either of these tasks, you’re in trouble.

Failure to secure any one of these boldface line items would sink even an established newspaper.

To bundle all of these failures together and describe them as “just a bump in the road” strikes me as hugely self-deceptive.

But  hey, I know very little about what happened. If I’m wrong, if you know more, please drop me a line at joelthurtell@gmail.com.

Posted in future of newspapers, Joel's J School | Leave a comment

Moilin’ in the deadline sun

By Bud Yardline

JOTR Sports Writer

[paypal-donation]

Ain’t that Luke Warm a cool hand with a column?

Only one problem from this side of the press room: He may be a college prof, but he’s still full of you know what.

Who’s he think he is, tryin’ to indict The New York Times for bullyin’ Tiger Woods?

Oh, I know, he seems to be praising the media, but I got a sinkin’ feelin’ he’s makin’ mock of us.

So what if the Times and a whole bunch of other media are tryin’ to intimidate Tiger into talkin’ when he don’t want to yap?

So what’s new?

There are rules to the game, Luke baby, and this is the way they’re played: You got a press card, you got special privileges. You go where you want to go and bully whoever you need to bully. You’re press, see, and you got a job to do.

Hey, I read Native Son by Richard Wright, too. Luke boy tries to make out like that rancid fictional murder yarn’s the same as Tiger’s bumpin’ into a fire hydrant in a private subdivision and then stayin’ mum while reporters try their usual tricks, Constitutionally-approved, I might add, to pry some words outa his mouth.

Well, guess what, who was it found the murdered girl’s body in the ashes of the furnace in Native Son?

Who was it, Luke my boy?

The press!

The reporters, ding dong!

The press solved the blinkin’ murder, for Chrissake!

So what if they were not exactly polite?

What’s that ol’ sayin’, ‘you want scrambled eggs, you gotta bust some eggshells?’

No point bein’ polite about it — when there’s news to be broke, you gotta bend the rules.

I mean, for Chrissake, journalism ain’t sports. Where’s the ref?

Hell, in news, there ain’t no ref, Luke!

We got no ump, so we make our rules up.

And then, if we don’t like ’em, we chuck ’em.

No rules are the best rules is what I say.

Just forget about playin’ by ’em entirely.

You know what my ol’ pal Robert Service said:

There are strange things done

In the deadline sun

By the men who moil for print.

Luke Warm is a bit too fancy dancy and la-dee-dah for my taste.

You’re a journalist, you gotta get that story. Period. End of story.

What I mean is, the story is the be all and end all.

If you don’t get it, some other moiler in the deadline sun will cremate your butt.

Better it be you, so you get that raise, all the credit and laurels an’ that pint a booze in the file drawer, and some other midnight toiler gets the boot.

An’ that’s all I got t’ say.

Posted in Joel's J School | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

A reporter’s best friend: Extortion

By Luke Warm

Professor of Mendacity, University of Munchausen

[paypal-donation]

There’s a scene in Richard Wright’s 1940 novel, Native Son, where a newspaper reporter lays down the lie that should be a tool in every journalist’s kit.

I thought of this strategem while reading the November 29, 2009 New York Times article, “Speculation fills the gap left by Woods’ silence.”

The Times story contains a very clever, if devious,  line of extortion, and since duplicity and mendacity are parts of the same glove, this effort deserves further study. It is eminently instructive.

Therefore, my lecture today will focus on the key and perhaps most-used technique for extracting damning comments from people thrust unwanted into the media spotlight: Extortion.

In Wright’s novel, Native Son, the reporter wants — needs — someone to talk to him.

Though the reporter does not yet know it, the lowly black chauffeur lurking in the background is to be his chief target. Bigger Thomas is a poor ghetto kid who has killed a rich white Chicago socialite. He has not yet been suspected. If he were white, he’d have a lawyer who’d warn him not, under any circumstances, to talk to reporters. Nothing he can say will help him, and anything he says could very likely hang him. But Bigger is black, he is poor, he has no lawyer, and the reporter is hungry for words.

Desperate.

He’s competing against other news hounds as desperate or maybe more so than he.

Any words will do.

He needs those live quotes.

This scene takes place in the basement furnace room of the wealthy family. Unknown to all but Bigger, the remains of the murdered woman are being incinerated in the coal furnace where Bigger placed them. The family is represented by a private investigator who has barred the family and household staff from talking to the press.

Under pressure from reporters, the private detective declares there will be no statement. “I’m sorry,” he says.

Whereupon, an ace reporter unwraps his primary weapon, a lie wrapped in a threat:

“You’re putting us in the position of having to print anything we can get about this case.”

This simple sentence contains so much power that I recommend students memorize it for future use when covering any kind of journalistic story. Indeed, it is so useful a statement that I believe every journalist should print it in boldface on a card, have it laminated, and carry it in their wallets just in case memory fails on a big scoop.

Let us dissect this statement, because it holds several pieces of information. First, as I said, the reporters will indeed write about the case whether or not any of the targets talk to them. It is always good to inject a modicum of truth into our works of mendacity.

But the prologue — “You’re putting us in the position…” is a masterful work of duplicity. Fact: Nobody invited these reporters into a private home. They have inserted themselves into the lives of their targets. They have invaded this house and are looking to sweep up anything they see or hear for use in their stories. Yet, they convert this weakness into a twisted strength by making it appear that they are being wronged. And by wronging the journalists, the targets — the actual victims — are sowing the seeds of retribution against themselves.

You’re putting us in the position of having to print anything we can get about this case.

So short, so concise, so perfect an example of pragmatic mendacity: It will get the job done.

The statement also contains a threat: I’m gonna write about your case whether you talk to me or not. Chances are, if you don’t talk, I’ll get some things wrong. Here’s your chance to set the record straight. Better talk now. Once we start printing that wrong stuff, it gets in people’s minds. Kind of takes over. You’ll never wipe it away with the truth.

I must repeat for you J school students that in this situation, the reporter is actually in the weaker position. Never forget that. You are the underdog. If the target refuses to talk, the reporter is out of luck. His or her hands are empty. That is a condition editors do not like. Editors tend to go ballistic when reporters show up with nought, nil, zilch. Therefore, this is a condition reporters should like even less. Raises and promotions are determined by scoops, and scoops are made by quotes.

Because the reporter is in fact in the subordinate position, it is important in bargaining with the target that the subject be made to believe — erroneously — that he or she has the weaker position. Here is where the first lie comes into play — if you won’t cooperate, we’ll print lies about you. In fact, it is never good to print lies about people, because sometimes those people sue. They call it libel.

Now, now, I hear you. Yes, we are all about lying here at U of M. But as I keep trying to stress, our lies must be subtle. Hard, even impossible, to detect.

That is why we try to layer our lies.

Of course, we are not going to intentionally print outright lies about a person, but we can use lies to persuade them to talk. If they won’t talk, we can speculate in print, cushioning our lies with enough “ifs” and “maybes” to ward off a libel attack.

Having planted the falsehood that we’ll lie about them in our next story, we layer that lie with the utterly false claim that we’re giving the target a chance to set the record straight.

What record?

Well, the record we create. Implicit in this is the threat that we’ll write a record that is negative to the target. We’ve thus sown the threat that we are prejudiced against him or her, as are our readers. That much is out of their power. But we let them know, falsely, of course, that we are generously giving them an opportunity to burnish the negative report we intend to write.

Naturally, what the target doesn’t know is that we have complete control over what sees print, and they have no power at all to “burnish” their side. But all these false impressions build up and appear, wrongly, as an argument in the minds of our target.

Ain’t that neat?

Now, how does this relate to Tiger Woods?

Well, seems Tiger was in his car in the wee hours, near his house in a gated subdivision, when he bumped into a fire hydrant. A neighbor called 911. Maybe Tiger was unconscious, maybe his wife extracted him unconscious from the car by bashing the rear window with a golf club. This is innuendo. We don’t know. We do know the cops thought it so minor an accident they  didn’t post it. Tiger was treated and released from a hospital.

Now, if this happened to you or me, nobody would give a rat’s ass.

But it happened to a billionaire golf pro.

So what, right? It’s still a nothing-burger, right?

Well, not exactly.

There is one subset of homo sapiens who finds this kind of trivia fascinating.

One substratum of humanity who definitely gives a rat’s ass.

I’m referring, of course, to reporters.

But it seems Tiger likes privacy. He’s not talking to cops. He’s not talking to reporters. He’s not talking to anyone, except maybe his lawyer and his agent.

He knows there’s nothing there. The press may fulminate about “charges” that could be filed. What would they be? Bumping into a fire hydrant? Illegally parking? Failure to control an automobile at a speed so low the airbags didn’t deploy?

Anyway, Tiger ain’t talkin.

So what’s to do?

Well, the Times knows what action to take: The old bully boy tactic straight from the playbook of that fictitious Chicago reporter in Richard Wright’s novel.

You’re putting us in the position of having to print anything we can get about this case.

The Times puts its own twist on this approach. It is worth studying for future use. Call a bunch of public relations “experts” and prod them to say that Tiger’s gonna be in trouble — his image will suffer — if he doesn’t set the record straight.

The Times‘s headline says it all: “Speculation Fills the Gap Left by Woods’s Silence.”

You’re putting us in the position of having to print anything we can get about this case.

If you don’t talk, we’ll print stuff anyway. It may not be right, but if we get it wrong, it’s your fault, Tiger. You shoulda talked to us right away.

Heads we win, tails you lose.

Ain’t that cute?

There’s nothing libelous there. In fact, there is no real content there. The basic facts about the accident were already published. Calling those PR talking heads is a journalistic trick, itself a neat bit of deception, that keeps the story afloat, giving other late-arriving journalists a chance to chew on and spit up the basic facts once more.

What’s really impressive about the Times story is that it manages to come off as a story at all, given that it covers up a huge gulch in reporting. The Timesman has done what the Bigger Thomas reporter so feared having to do: He has written a story despite having no quotes from the prime suspect.

By fronting his story with all those talking heads and making Tiger’s reticence the story, the Times manages to disguise the fact that, in truth, it has nothing new to report.

That, my friends, is an example of mendacity at its quintessential and consummate best.

Please don’t be deceived into thinking this story was written for Times readers. It was written with one purpose in mind: Getting into Tiger’s head and bullying him into fulfilling a reporter’s fantasy — a call from Tiger Woods.

Exclusive to the Times.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell@gmail.com

Posted in Joel's J School | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Of pizzas, pools and prosecutors: or, how the ‘Free’ Press (once again) muzzled itself

The Wall Street Journal‘s revelation that my onetime employer, The Detroit [Self-Styled] Free Press, had invited advertisers to participate in the reporting and editing process came as no surprise to me.

I worked at the Free Press 23 years if you count more than two years on strike in the ’90s. So many fine stories were choked off. The one that most people remember is the true story of how those Bill Day political cartoons about then U.S. Attorney General Ed Meese were trash-canned. Back in the ’80s, editors killed Bill’s drawings because they were afraid they’d piss off Meese, someone with a big say in approving the Joint Operating Agreement between The Detroit News and The Detroit Free Press.

Freep editors can find all kinds of reasons for spiking stories. Mostly, though, they never offer a reason. When they do, the logic is often contorted or nonexistent. One of the dopiest excuses I heard was given to me by an editor who had the sorry duty of telling me the bosses were killing my article, reported and written for the Free Press, about then Wayne County Prosecutor Mike Duggan’s illegal Super Bowl pool. My story was killed for a reason that stands as the lamest excuse for newspaper self-censorship I’ve ever heard.

If readers know of a more hare-brained, self-serving and stupid pretext for spiking a story than the one you’ll learn about in this article, please let me know. I first published my account in JOTR on February 3, 2008, in time for the 2008 Super Bowl. Given the special deals, recently revealed by the WSJ, that the Free Press doled out to Humana, Inc. and Target, I really can’t wait for the next Super Bowl to repeat this story.

Here it is, all over again:

Spiking the Super Bowl pizza

By Joel Thurtell

I’m no sports writer, so it was neat to think my byline would appear over a Super Bowl story.

What a drag that my first-ever Super Bowl piece failed to meet the exacting publication standards of the Detroit Free Press.

Yes, my Super Bowl story was spiked.

Personally, I thought it was a pretty good little tale. Nothing like Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick maybe or maybe not committing perjury with his love-crazed text messages that seem to suggest he committed perjury in court when he denied having an affair with his chief of staff.

My little story was no match for that, but still, it would have given readers a chance to ask what is and what is not tolerable behavior by a law enforcement official. Is it okay for a prosecutor, say, to break the law if he does it at home, with his pals?

It was back when I was drafted from the Free Press Oakland bureau to work on the Ed McNamara story, late in 2002. That was right after the FBI — with lots of media fanfare — raided the offices of the late Ed McNamara, then Wayne County executive.

Any story about Mac was perforce a story about his right-hand man, the onetime deputy Wayne County executive, Mike Duggan.

By this time, Mike was Wayne County prosecutor. But Mike was thoroughly entwined in the McNamara Band’s political ops, so if the fed’s spotlight was on Mac, it was automatically on Mike Duggan.

Hey, anybody heard about that FBI probe lately? They prosecuted a couple of people, I seem to recall, but they never charged anyone close to Mac or Mike.

But never fear, for I was investigating, too.

What, you might ask, was the editor, reporter, staff writer, photographer, chief layout person, chief of the copy desk and all around mayordomo of joelontheroad.com doing on the McNamara story? Well, it happens that for a couple years pre-newspaper strike, meaning from about May of 1993 till July 13, 1995, I was the reporter whose job it was to cover Wayne County doings. Of course, by the time of the FBI raid, I’d been off that job for, well, about eight years, either striking, running my used radio business, writing a novel and then back at the paper I was writing about Oakland County lakes. Why tap me for the McNamara story?

Well, they needed SOMEBODY to do it. The Detroit News was kicking the Free Press’ butt left and right with a reporter duo well-connected both to county and federal sources. That one-two punch was burying the Free Press, where one reporter, actually, one super-reporter, Dennis Niemiec, was covering … Oh, let’s see, what did Dennis cover? Why, he covered Livonia, he covered Plymouth and Canton and Northville and anything else western Waynish. He covered the Wayne County Detroit Metropolitan Airport (a full-time job by itself) and let’s see, oh by the way, he covered Wayne County. All from a desk in an office in a strip-office at Six and Newburgh in Livonia.

Somebody figured out Dennis needed help. Somebody thought of me. A guy who covered Wayne County eight years ago could do it again. Besides, nobody else wanted the job. One look at Dennis — tired, frustrated and beaten up — was warning enough.

So the News was eating our lunch every day and I was supposed to help Dennis turn this thing around. Dennis offered solace. He told me his “pizza” theory. Editors, he said, aren’t looking for real substance in stories. What they want is a talker, a story they can hype in the various meetings that consume much of their working days. A story they can chuckle about, joke about, make other editors envious about. A story, in short, that was like a pizza. Full of short-term flavor, high on fat, tasty, but not necessarily of lasting value except maybe to the waistline.

By the time Super Bowl 2003 rolled around, I was delivering pizzas, or trying to, by myself. The day after New Years, I was roaming around the bowels of the City-County Building in Detroit looking for some records having to do with county officials’ conflict of interest disclosures. I’d found them where county officials had squirreled them away in some file cabinets in the back of the county’s cavernous print shop. I emerged into a cold, blustery morning to see Bob Ficano, newly-elected Wayne County exec, giving his maiden speech on the steps of the county executive building. Standing in the crowd taking notes was Mike Elrick, a Free Press reporter none too happy about being there. “Where’s Niemiec? He’s supposed to be covering this,” Mike said.

At that very moment, Dennis was in the offices of Free Press bosses tendering his resignation. He’d no longer be delivering pizzas. He was going to be a public relations guy for the very county executive whose speech was thundering via the PA speakers up Lafayette Boulevard.

Boy, did I think I had a pizza, though. I’d heard from sources both inside and around the prosecutor’s office that Mike Duggan had a little pizza party of his own on Super Bowl Sunday. Well, I don’t know if he served pizza, but the main thing is that he and his assistant prosecutors had a pool. They bet on the outcome of the game.

You know, a Super Bowl pool. They’re everywhere. Why, they had them in the newsroom, in the sports department. Pools were and I’m sure still are a big deal at the Free Press and probably at most other papers.

But they are illegal. So says the Michigan Penal Code. Mike didn’t deny holding the pool. He told me, “I’m learning that I can’t relax and make a mistake for a single minute when you’re the prosecutor. But I’ve learned. I sent a twenty dollar check over to Focus Hope as a donation to charity and I’ve learned a lesson from it.”

Just because he said he did it and just because the Penal Code says it’s illegal doesn’t mean Mike broke the law. See, we have this thing called the “presumption of innocence.” For the pool to have been truly illegal, there would have to have been an investigation. Then, a prosecutor somewhere (obviously not in Wayne County) would have to have authorized a warrant charging Mike with the crime. But even then, it wouldn’t have been a crime. No, it wouldn’t have been a crime until a judge or jury had found him guilty of violating the anti-pool law.

Until then, any story I wrote would lean heavily on words such as “alleged” and “apparent.”

How can I explain this in a more timely way? Well, let’s think about the mayor of Detroit, Kwame Kilpatrick. The media have been tooting the perjury horn since Mike Elrick and Jim Schaefer broke the most recent Kwame-gate story. And quite a story it is. But we can’t say Kwame actually committed perjury until a judge or jury convicts him of that crime.

Presumption of innocence.

Okay, so I was armed with all my “apparents” and “allegeds” and I wrote a story that might have gone down in history as “poolgate” or “Bowlgate.”

But the only bowl my story found was in the toilet.

I quoted Mike, I quoted a UM law prof, I quoted the Penal Code. I had a neat story about a prosecutor sworn to uphold the law sponsoring a gambling activity that admittedly was low stakes but that allegedly, maybe, violated the criminal code. No charges, no trial, no conviction. Standard journalism: I quoted people including Mike who said the pool took place.

Kind of like I imagine happened with the Kwame Kilpatrick text message story. Nobody’s denying the text messages, right? Into the paper it goes.

Not so fast. My story was written. It was in the computer. People were stopping by my desk to share a laugh. Great story.

The editors found the story highly amusing. A great read. But there was a problem. It’s called the double-standard, aka hypocrisy. People who live in glass houses and all that.

An editor broke the news: “If we print your story, we’ll never be able to hold another Super Bowl pool at the Free Press.”

So, thanks to Free Press editors, Mike Duggan dodged a bullet.

Kwame Kilpatrick was not so lucky.

Consider this: Kwame being investigated. That is the first step towards determining whether he violated any laws. Why is there an investigation? Because of a newspaper story.

Here’s a parting thought: Outside the newspaper industry, many people are legitimately worried about The Future of Newspapers.

At the newspaper, though, the big concern was about The Future of our Super Bowl Pool.

Contact me at joelthurtell(a)gmail.com

Posted in Bad government, censorship, future of newspapers, Joel's J School | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Mattyville

By Joel Thurtell

Boarded up house in Mattyville. Joel Thurtell photo.

Boarded up house in Mattyville. Joel Thurtell photo.

[paypal-donation]

They ought to call it “Mattyville.”

A proper place name might help focus the brains of the “protesters” who were kicked out of a recent Windsor City Council meeting for failing to restrain their emotions about a neighborhood of vacant homes in Windsor.

These critics haven’t figured out that the author of the urban blight they so detest is not the city of Windsor, but the billionaire owner of the Ambassador Bridge.

The bridge squats in the middle of a once vibrant neighborhood turned into a ghost town by trucking magnate Manuel “Matty” Moroun.

Oh sure, the “protesters” have a point — dozens of boarded-up houses around the Ambassador bridge in Windsor are not only eyesores, but firetraps and refuges for vermin.

It’s a bad situation.

But the protesters need to have their heads screwed on right.

Instead of berating council members, they ought to march on the Ambassador Bridge.

Better yet, picket the Grosse Pointe home of the billionaire Ambassador Bridge owner, Manuel “Matty” Moroun.

Another pad in Mattyville. Joel Thurtell photo.

Another pad in Mattyville. Joel Thurtell photo.

It was Matty, through companies he owns, who bought and boarded up these houses to make room for a second bridge that now looks like a no show.

It is amazing — and sickening — that one rich man could create such blight in a community.

Southwest Detroiters will tell you he’s done the same thing on their side of the river.

But here in Windsor, in the shadow of Matty’s bridge, sit house after house,  deserted.

A row of boarded up houses in Mattyville. Joel Thurtell photo.

A row of boarded up houses in Mattyville. Joel Thurtell photo.

Block after block.

Why these “protesters” would turn their rage against elected officials who never wanted to see a Mattyville of empty homes is beyond my ken.

To hold that Matty is not responsible, you’d need a certain willing suspension of belief in what is real and what is fantasy.

Matty Moroun is real.

The bridge is real.

The neighborhood is real.

Matty bought the neighborhood.

Matty turned it into a ghost town, very real.

If you want to protest something that is not fantasy, look the man who is really responsible.

That would be Matty.

Drop me a line at joelthurtell@gmail.com

Posted in Me & Matty | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments